UO Faculty Union Pushes Back Against Humanities Budget Cuts

Aug 24, 2025, 2:09 AM
Image for article UO Faculty Union Pushes Back Against Humanities Budget Cuts

Hover over text to view sources

The University of Oregon (UO) is facing mounting pressure as faculty unions, religious scholars, and student governments rally against proposed budget cuts to humanities programs. According to the United Academics (UA), UO’s faculty union, the university may eliminate several faculty positions across humanities departments, sparking fears of long-term impacts on academic offerings and student access . The potential reductions follow a projected $25 million to $30 million "structural deficit" identified during spring budget discussions .

Faculty Union and Religious Scholars' Concerns

UA has vowed to engage in bargaining discussions with UO as fall term begins, urging the university to explore alternatives to layoffs. Nathan Whalen, UA chair of the Grievances & Contract Administration Committee, emphasized the need for "ways to avoid laying off a large number of faculty" to address the deficit . The American Academy of Religion, a global association of scholars, also expressed alarm over the cuts, stating that religious studies are "essential to understanding global challenges such as violence and poverty" and warned against eliminating the field altogether .

Student Government and Program Impacts

UO’s student government, Associated Students of the University of Oregon (ASUO), has voiced support for faculty unions, with President Prissila Moreno highlighting student concerns about academic program stability. "Students are reaching out asking if they’ll be able to finish their degrees," Moreno said, stressing the need for greater faculty involvement in budget decisions . Specific programs at risk include German and Scandinavian studies, Russian, Arabic, Portuguese, and classics departments, with potential impacts on language offerings and graduate programs like Holocaust studies and Judaic studies .

University’s Budget Justification

UO administration maintains that budget cuts are necessary to address financial shortfalls, citing a "structural deficit" requiring reductions across multiple areas. In an Aug. 22 statement, the university emphasized it is "involving faculty in budget discussions" and ensuring no single group bears disproportionate cuts . However, UA President Kate Mills criticized the process, noting that tenured faculty layoffs are being considered "in a fraction of the time" required for tenure decisions, raising concerns about bias and transparency .

Broader Context: Similar Cuts at WVU

The situation mirrors ongoing struggles at West Virginia University (WVU), where board members approved slashing 143 faculty positions and eliminating all foreign language degree programs amid declining enrollment and budget pressures. Students and faculty there protested, with some calling the cuts "unprecedented" and arguing they harm both academic quality and regional communities . While WVU saved two faculty roles in world languages, it still plans to eliminate most language minors and graduate programs in mathematics and public administration .

Student Reactions and Uncertainty

Students like Yulia Kolechkina, a Russian major at UO, fear cuts will disrupt their academic paths. "If I’m not allowed to finish the program… I don’t even know what I’m going to do," she said, highlighting how language programs impact broader disciplines . Meanwhile, donors like Jordan Schnitzer have expressed confidence in university leadership, though he acknowledged the need for difficult financial decisions .

Ongoing Protests and Legal Actions

UA plans a Sept. 16 rally during the UO Board of Trustees meeting to pressure administrators, warning that layoffs will "have long-term damaging repercussions" for the institution. The union also urged students to contact university officials in opposition to cuts, while ASUO pledged continued collaboration with labor groups on campus . As no final decisions have been made, the debate over balancing fiscal responsibility and academic priorities remains unresolved.

Related articles

Government Support for Religion Doesn't Necessarily Boost Religious Participation

New research challenges the notion that government support for religion increases religiosity, citing historical examples and surveys showing mixed outcomes. Scholars argue such policies may inadvertently reduce participation by undermining religious autonomy.

Debate Revived Over Virtual Jewish Charter School in Oklahoma

A proposal for a virtual Jewish charter school in Oklahoma is reigniting discussions about the legality of religious public schools. The Ben Gamla Jewish Charter School aims to integrate Jewish studies with state-approved academics, but faces potential legal challenges following a recent Supreme Court deadlock on a similar Catholic school initiative.

Hegseth's Vision for DOD's AI and Tech Transformation

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has unveiled a comprehensive strategy to accelerate the Department of Defense's adoption of artificial intelligence and advanced technologies. This initiative aims to dismantle bureaucratic barriers and foster a unified innovation ecosystem to enhance military capabilities and maintain a competitive edge against adversaries.

Court Ruling Protects Health Research Funding from Trump Cuts

A federal appeals court has upheld a ruling that prevents the Trump administration from cutting billions in medical research funding. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel expressed relief over the decision, which safeguards critical funding for biomedical research across the nation.

The Weaponization of Christianity by American Nationalists

American nationalists increasingly leverage Christian beliefs to promote a political agenda that intertwines religion with governance. This trend raises concerns about the implications for democracy and social cohesion, as it often marginalizes non-Christian groups and promotes exclusionary ideologies.