A proposal for a virtual Jewish charter school in Oklahoma is reigniting discussions about the legality of religious public schools. The Ben Gamla Jewish Charter School aims to integrate Jewish studies with state-approved academics, but faces potential legal challenges following a recent Supreme Court deadlock on a similar Catholic school initiative.

## Debate Revived Over Virtual Jewish Charter School in Oklahoma

A group is seeking approval to establish a virtual Jewish charter school in Oklahoma, reigniting the contentious debate over the legality of religious public schools.

The proposed Ben Gamla Jewish Charter School aims to integrate Jewish religious studies with Oklahoma's academic standards, a move that has drawn both support and opposition from various stakeholders in the state.

Peter Deutsch, the founder of the Ben Gamla Jewish Charter School, presented the application to the Oklahoma Charter School Board, asserting that there is a demand for a faith-based educational option among Oklahoma families.

"We believe we have submitted an outstanding application, and we ask that the board approve the application," Deutsch stated.

The proposal comes in the wake of a 2023 ruling by the Oklahoma Supreme Court, which determined that a proposed Catholic virtual charter school violated both state and federal constitutions.

This ruling was upheld by a 4-4 deadlock in the US Supreme Court, following Justice Amy Coney Barrett's recusal due to personal ties to the case.

The Ben Gamla initiative is seen as an attempt to navigate around these legal obstacles, with plans to challenge any potential rejection in federal court.

The legal team representing Ben Gamla, led by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, is prepared to argue that denying funding to religious charter schools constitutes discrimination.

"The state giving funding to secular charter schools, but not religious ones, amounts to discrimination," said Eric Baxter, an attorney for the school.

The proposed school would initially enroll around 40 students and is expected to open in the 2026-27 school year.

Local Jewish leaders have expressed concern over the proposal, stating that they were not consulted before the application was submitted.

Rabbi Daniel Kaiman of Congregation B'nai Emunah in Tulsa voiced his surprise at learning about the initiative through media reports rather than from the organizers themselves.

He emphasized the importance of maintaining good relationships within the community and questioned the necessity of a new charter school given the existing educational offerings for Jewish students in Oklahoma.

The Ben Gamla proposal is part of a broader trend where religious groups are seeking to establish charter schools that incorporate faith-based education.

This movement has gained momentum following recent Supreme Court rulings that have opened the door for public funding of religious institutions.

However, organizations like Americans United for Separation of Church and State have vowed to oppose such initiatives, arguing that they undermine the principle of church-state separation.

The Oklahoma Charter School Board is set to review the application next month, and the outcome could have significant implications for the future of religious education in the state.

If the board denies the application, the legal battle is expected to escalate, potentially leading to a landmark case that could redefine the boundaries of religious education in public schools.

As the debate unfolds, the Ben Gamla Jewish Charter School's proposal highlights the complexities surrounding educational choice, religious freedom, and the role of government in funding religious institutions.

The outcome of this case may set a precedent for similar initiatives across the country, as advocates for religious education continue to seek ways to integrate faith into public schooling.

The situation remains fluid, and stakeholders from various sides of the debate are closely monitoring developments.

The decision by the Oklahoma Charter School Board will be pivotal in determining the future of the proposed Ben Gamla Jewish Charter School and the broader implications for religious education in public schools nationwide.

Debate Revived Over Virtual Jewish Charter School in Oklahoma

debate-revived-over-virtual-jewish-charter-school-in-oklahoma

American nationalists increasingly leverage Christian beliefs to promote a political agenda that intertwines religion with governance. This trend raises concerns about the implications for democracy and social cohesion, as it often marginalizes non-Christian groups and promotes exclusionary ideologies.

## The Weaponization of Christianity by American Nationalists

In recent years, the rise of Christian nationalism in the United States has become a significant concern for many observers of American politics.

This movement, which intertwines religious beliefs with national identity, is increasingly being used as a tool for political power, often at the expense of democratic principles and social inclusivity.

According to a comprehensive survey conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI), approximately 30% of Americans identify as adherents or sympathizers of Christian nationalism, with this figure being notably higher in red states compared to blue states.

The movement is characterized by a belief that the US should be governed according to Christian values, which many argue undermines the foundational principle of separation of church and state.

Christian nationalists often assert that America has a divine mandate, claiming a special bond between God and the nation.

This ideology can lead to the exclusion of non-Christian groups and the promotion of policies that favor a specific interpretation of Christianity.

For instance, the movement has been linked to white supremacy, as it often promotes the idea that America should be a nation primarily for white Christians.

This has alarming parallels to historical instances where religion was used to justify authoritarian regimes, such as in Nazi Germany, where the church was co-opted to support the state.

The implications of this movement are profound.

Many Christian nationalists believe that political violence may be justified to achieve their goals, with a significant percentage agreeing that "true American patriots may have to resort to violence to save the country." This sentiment is particularly prevalent among those who identify strongly with the movement.

The January 6 insurrection is often cited as a manifestation of this dangerous ideology, where Christian symbols were prominently displayed alongside calls for violence against the government.

Moreover, the movement's influence extends into mainstream politics, where many politicians align themselves with Christian nationalist rhetoric to garner support from their base.

This alignment is particularly evident among Republican voters, where a majority express favorable views towards the intertwining of Christian values with governance.

The PRRI survey indicates that 64% of white evangelical Protestants are either adherents or sympathizers of Christian nationalism, highlighting the movement's strong roots within certain religious communities.

Critics argue that this fusion of religion and politics not only threatens the democratic framework of the United States but also distorts the core teachings of Christianity.

The gospel, which emphasizes love and inclusivity, is often weaponized to justify exclusionary practices and policies.

This distortion raises ethical questions about the role of faith in public life and the responsibilities of religious leaders to uphold the true tenets of their faith.

The challenge lies in addressing the rise of Christian nationalism while fostering a more inclusive society.

Many Americans, including a significant number of religious individuals, advocate for a clear separation between church and state, believing that governance should be based on democratic principles rather than religious doctrine.

This perspective is crucial for maintaining a pluralistic society where all individuals, regardless of their faith or lack thereof, can coexist peacefully.

As the debate over Christian nationalism continues, it is essential for citizens to critically engage with these issues and advocate for a political landscape that respects both religious freedom and the principles of democracy.

The future of American society may depend on our ability to navigate these complex intersections of faith and politics without compromising the values that underpin our democratic ideals.

In conclusion, the weaponization of Christianity by American nationalists poses significant risks to the fabric of American democracy.

It is imperative for individuals and communities to stand against this trend, promoting a vision of society that embraces diversity and upholds the fundamental rights of all citizens, regardless of their religious beliefs.

The Weaponization of Christianity by American Nationalists

the-weaponization-of-christianity-by-american-nationalists

As the holiday season approaches, many grapple with the challenge of celebrating Christmas in a world filled with grief and turmoil. This article explores how to invite meaning into Christmas feasts by reflecting on compassion, gratitude, and the timeless message of hope that the season embodies.

## Finding Meaning in Christmas Amid Global Turmoil

The holiday season often serves as a time for reflection, celebration, and gratitude.

However, for many, it can also be a complex ritual filled with conflicting emotions.

As Christmas approaches, the weight of global events can overshadow the festive spirit, leaving individuals to ponder how to celebrate meaningfully in a world rife with turmoil and grief.

In recent years, tragedies such as the Tai Po fire in Hong Kong have left communities mourning, making it difficult to gather around a table filled with abundance while others suffer.

The loss of lives, both young and old, creates a palpable sadness that can dampen the holiday spirit.

Food designer Alison Tan reflects on her own struggles during such times, noting that the grief from global events, including the ongoing Israel-Gaza conflict, can make it challenging to engage in traditional celebrations.

Despite these challenges, the essence of Christmas remains rooted in its timeless message of love, hope, and joy.

The birth of Jesus Christ, celebrated on December 25, serves as a reminder that even amidst chaos, there is a message worth celebrating.

This message encourages individuals to find ways to incorporate compassion and understanding into their holiday gatherings.

To invite meaning into Christmas feasts, it is essential to acknowledge the suffering of others while also recognizing one's own privileges.

This balance can be achieved through acts of compassion, such as inviting those who may be alone or in need to join the celebration.

Sharing the meal with those who are less fortunate not only honors the spirit of giving but also fosters a sense of community and connection.

Moreover, taking time to express gratitude for the blessings in one's life can help shift the focus from what is lacking to what is present.

This practice can be as simple as sharing stories of resilience and hope during the meal, allowing everyone to reflect on the positive aspects of their lives, even in difficult times.

Setting the right atmosphere for a Christmas feast can also enhance its significance.

Incorporating elements that reflect the true meaning of the season, such as decorations that symbolize hope and love, can create a more profound experience for all attendees.

For instance, lighting candles can serve as a reminder of the light that Jesus brought into the world, illuminating the darkness that often surrounds us.

Additionally, engaging in traditional Christmas activities, such as singing carols or reading the Christmas story, can help ground the celebration in its spiritual roots.

These practices not only honor the religious significance of the holiday but also create a shared experience that can deepen connections among family and friends.

It is also important to recognize that the holiday season can bring up personal struggles, including feelings of loss or disappointment.

Acknowledging these emotions rather than suppressing them can lead to a more authentic celebration.

Sharing personal stories of grief or challenges faced throughout the year can foster a sense of solidarity among guests, reminding everyone that they are not alone in their struggles.

Incorporating moments of silence or reflection during the feast can provide space for individuals to honor their feelings and the memories of those who are no longer with them.

This practice can transform the gathering into a space of healing and understanding, allowing for a more meaningful connection to the holiday's true essence.

As we navigate a world filled with turmoil, inviting meaning into our Christmas feasts requires a conscious effort to blend celebration with compassion.

By acknowledging the suffering of others, expressing gratitude, and creating a meaningful atmosphere, we can honor the true spirit of the season.

Ultimately, Christmas serves as a reminder that even in the darkest times, there is hope, love, and the possibility of joy.

In this way, the holiday can become not just a time of festivity, but a profound opportunity for reflection, connection, and healing in a world that desperately needs it.

Finding Meaning in Christmas Amid Global Turmoil

finding-meaning-in-christmas-amid-global-turmoil

In a world filled with challenges, the Christmas feast can serve as a meaningful gathering. By focusing on the true essence of Christmas, families can create a celebration that emphasizes love, hope, and community, even amidst turmoil.

## Inviting Meaning to Your Christmas Feast Amid Turmoil

As Christmas approaches, many families find themselves reflecting on the true meaning of the holiday.

In a world filled with turmoil and uncertainty, the Christmas feast can serve as a powerful reminder of love, hope, and community.

This year, consider how to invite deeper meaning into your celebrations.

Christmas is traditionally a time for gathering with loved ones, sharing meals, and creating memories.

However, the essence of Christmas extends beyond the festivities.

It is rooted in the birth of Jesus Christ, a symbol of hope and joy that remains relevant even in challenging times.

The message of Christmas is timeless, reminding us that love and compassion can prevail despite the difficulties we face.

To create a meaningful Christmas feast, start by incorporating elements that reflect the true spirit of the season.

This can include sharing stories of kindness and generosity, which can inspire others to act with compassion.

For instance, consider inviting guests to share their own experiences of hope or acts of kindness they have witnessed throughout the year.

This not only fosters a sense of community but also reinforces the values that Christmas embodies.

Another way to enhance the meaning of your Christmas gathering is to focus on the act of giving.

Encourage guests to bring items for a local charity or food bank, transforming your feast into an opportunity to support those in need.

This act of generosity can serve as a powerful reminder of the importance of community and compassion, especially during difficult times.

Incorporating prayer or moments of reflection into your celebration can also deepen the experience.

Taking a moment to express gratitude for the blessings in your life can help shift the focus from materialism to appreciation for what truly matters.

This aligns with the Christmas message of love and hope, allowing everyone to connect on a more profound level.

As you prepare your feast, consider the significance of the food you serve.

Traditional dishes can evoke memories and stories that connect generations.

Sharing these stories can create a sense of continuity and belonging, reminding everyone of the importance of family and heritage.

Moreover, the ambiance of your gathering can play a crucial role in setting the tone.

Decorate your space with symbols of the season, such as nativity scenes or candles, which can serve as visual reminders of the holiday's significance.

Soft music or Christmas carols can also enhance the atmosphere, inviting guests to reflect on the joy and peace that the season brings.

In a world where news often highlights division and strife, Christmas can be a time to come together and celebrate our shared humanity.

By focusing on the values of love, hope, and community, your Christmas feast can become a sanctuary of peace and joy.

Ultimately, the goal is to create an environment where everyone feels valued and connected.

This can be achieved through open conversations, shared experiences, and acts of kindness.

As we gather around the table, let us remember that the true meaning of Christmas lies not in the gifts we exchange but in the love we share and the hope we inspire in one another.

In conclusion, as you plan your Christmas feast this year, take the opportunity to invite meaning into your celebration.

By emphasizing the core values of the holiday, you can create a gathering that not only nourishes the body but also uplifts the spirit.

In doing so, you will contribute to a sense of unity and hope that is much needed in today's world.

May your Christmas be filled with love, joy, and a renewed sense of purpose as you celebrate with family and friends.

Inviting Meaning to Your Christmas Feast Amid Turmoil

inviting-meaning-to-your-christmas-feast-amid-turmoil

Donald Trump's MAGA coalition is facing significant challenges as religious leaders and groups push back against his administration's policies, particularly regarding immigration. This discord highlights a growing divide within the coalition, especially among evangelical communities that are increasingly concerned about the treatment of immigrants.

## Cracks in Trump's MAGA Coalition Over Religious Issues

Donald Trump's MAGA coalition is showing signs of strain, particularly over issues related to religion and immigration.

As Trump's administration continues to push policies that many religious leaders deem inhumane, a growing number of voices within the Christian community are beginning to push back against the MAGA agenda.

One of the most notable sources of dissent comes from the Roman Catholic Church.

Pope Leo XIV, the first American pontiff, has been vocal in his criticism of the Trump administration's immigration policies, which he describes as "extremely disrespectful." He has called for the humane treatment of undocumented immigrants, a stance that has been echoed by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, which condemned the administration's approach to mass deportations and dehumanizing rhetoric.

This pushback is not limited to Catholicism.

The Episcopal Church has also expressed its discontent, particularly regarding the treatment of immigrants.

The church has urged the government to exercise mercy and compassion, especially towards vulnerable populations.

In a significant move, the Episcopal Church ended its long-standing refugee resettlement partnership with the government, citing a commitment to racial justice as a moral imperative.

The Southern Baptist Convention, a major evangelical group, has also found itself at a crossroads.

While it previously supported more humane immigration policies, recent conventions have seen a marked shift away from addressing immigration issues altogether.

Many local pastors are caught in a dilemma, torn between their commitment to their congregations and the fear of alienating conservative members who support Trump's hardline stance.

This internal conflict within the evangelical community is particularly concerning given the demographic shifts in American Christianity.

Latinos represent the fastest-growing group of American evangelicals, and many of them supported Trump in the 2024 election.

However, the administration's aggressive immigration policies may alienate this crucial demographic, raising questions about the long-term viability of the MAGA coalition.

The fractures within the MAGA coalition are further exacerbated by Trump's declining approval ratings and the emergence of dissenting voices within the Republican Party.

As Trump's influence wanes, more Republicans are willing to break ranks, a stark contrast to the previously unwavering loyalty seen during his first term.

Moreover, the ongoing scandals surrounding Trump, including his connections to Jeffrey Epstein, have begun to alienate core supporters.

This has led to a reevaluation of loyalty among some factions of the MAGA movement, with figures like Marjorie Taylor Greene publicly breaking with Trump over these issues.

The schism within the MAGA coalition reflects a broader societal divide in the United States, where many Americans are grappling with the concept of "simple human decency." This divide is evident in the contrasting views on immigration and the treatment of marginalized communities, which many religious leaders argue are fundamental to Christian teachings.

As the 2026 midterms approach, the implications of these internal conflicts could be significant.

The MAGA coalition, once seen as a monolithic force, is now facing challenges that could reshape its future.

The question remains whether Trump can navigate these cracks in his coalition or if they will lead to a more profound realignment within the Republican Party.

In conclusion, the growing dissent among religious leaders and the shifting demographics within evangelical communities signal a potential crisis for Trump's MAGA coalition.

As these issues come to the forefront, the future of the coalition may depend on its ability to reconcile its policies with the values espoused by many of its supporters.

Cracks in Trump's MAGA Coalition Over Religious Issues

cracks-in-trump-s-maga-coalition-over-religious-issues

Over 60 current and former NFL players have urged US leaders to take action against religious persecution in Nigeria. In a letter addressed to President Trump and Congress, they highlighted the urgent need for humanitarian aid and sanctions to protect vulnerable communities facing violence.

## NFL Players Call for Action Against Religious Persecution in Nigeria

In a significant move, more than 60 current and former NFL players have united to urge US leaders to address the escalating religious persecution in Nigeria.

The players, coordinated by Sports Spectrum, submitted a letter to President Trump and key Congressional leaders on December 19, 2025, calling for immediate action to curb the violence against religious groups, particularly Christians, in the West African nation.

The letter, signed by prominent athletes including quarterbacks CJ Stroud, Brock Purdy, and TreVeyon Henderson, as well as Hall of Fame coach Tony Dungy, expresses deep concern over the ongoing violence and persecution faced by religious communities in Nigeria.

"As current and former NFL players who care deeply about justice - here in America and around the world - we are grieved and outraged by the mounting violence," the letter states, urging leaders to act swiftly to confront this crisis.

The players highlighted the alarming statistics surrounding religious violence in Nigeria, where an average of 32 to 35 Christians were killed each day during the first seven months of 2025.

Since 2009, an estimated 52,000 Christians have lost their lives due to religiously motivated violence, making Nigeria one of the most dangerous places for Christians globally, ranking seventh on the Open Doors World Watch List for extreme persecution.

The letter emphasizes the ineffectiveness of the Nigerian Army and security services in addressing the violence perpetrated by groups such as the Fulani Ethnic Militia (FEM), which has been responsible for mass atrocities and the displacement of entire communities.

The players called for a new approach that includes dismantling the FEM, expanding US humanitarian assistance, and appointing an Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom to lead US strategies in Nigeria.

Benjamin Watson, a former NFL player and editor-in-chief of Sports Spectrum, played a pivotal role in organizing the letter.

He noted that the recent kidnapping of over 200 children from a Catholic boarding school in Nigeria was a catalyst for this initiative.

Watson stated, "We want to show that we're amongst the people who care and want to stand up with our brothers and sisters who are suffering in Nigeria".

The players' letter is a historic first for Sports Spectrum, which has previously focused on sports and faith but has never before issued a letter to US political leaders.

The group aims to raise awareness not only among politicians but also among fans, emphasizing that the violence in Nigeria should concern everyone.

"This was a moment where we had an opportunity to speak about justice and about kindness and about caring for our neighbors," Watson remarked.

Steve Stenstrom, president of Sports Spectrum, echoed the sentiment, stating that the issue transcends political divides.

"This isn't a left or right issue; it's a life-or-death issue for people on the ground," he said.

The players expressed a moral responsibility to speak out, urging US leaders to use their influence to defend the fundamental right to live and worship freely in Nigeria.

The letter concludes with a powerful plea: "We ask you, as leaders of this nation, to use the full weight of your offices to defend the fundamental right to live and worship freely and to send a clear message that the United States will not stand by while Nigerians are targeted, terrorized, and killed because of their faith.

As the situation in Nigeria continues to deteriorate, the call to action from these NFL players highlights the urgent need for international attention and intervention to protect vulnerable religious communities facing persecution and violence.

NFL Players Call for Action Against Religious Persecution in Nigeria

nfl-players-call-for-action-against-religious-persecution-in-nigeria

Canada's proposed hate speech legislation, Bill C-9, aims to combat rising hate crimes but raises concerns about potential impacts on religious expression. Critics argue that removing protections for sincerely held beliefs could lead to a chilling effect on faith communities, echoing similar cases in Finland. The legislation's implications for free speech and religious freedom are under scrutiny as debates continue.

## Canada's Proposed Hate Speech Law: Implications for Religious Freedom

Canada's government is currently considering Bill C-9, a proposed amendment to the Criminal Code aimed at addressing the alarming rise in hate crimes across the country.

The legislation seeks to make it a crime to intimidate individuals from accessing places of worship and to clearly define hate-motivated crimes, ensuring accountability for offenders.

However, the bill has sparked significant debate regarding its potential implications for religious freedom and free speech.

The proposed changes include removing existing protections for sincerely held religious beliefs, which has raised concerns among various faith communities.

Critics argue that this removal could stifle the ability of individuals to express their religious views freely, particularly when referencing sacred texts.

The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops has expressed that the elimination of these protections could create uncertainty for clergy and educators, who may fear that traditional moral teachings could be misinterpreted as hate speech, leading to severe legal consequences.

The situation in Finland serves as a cautionary tale for Canada.

There, prominent figures, including a Member of Parliament and a bishop, have faced multiple trials for expressing traditional religious views on marriage and sexuality.

These cases have raised alarms about the potential for similar "Bible Trials" in Canada if Bill C-9 passes without adequate protections for religious expression.

The Finnish experience highlights the risks of societal censorship and the chilling effect on freedom of speech and religion that can arise from such legislation.

Supporters of Bill C-9 argue that the law is necessary to combat rising antisemitism, Islamophobia, and other forms of hate that have left many feeling unsafe in their communities.

The legislation aims to clarify what constitutes hate speech and streamline the process for law enforcement to act against hate propaganda.

However, the balance between protecting communities from hate and preserving individual freedoms remains a contentious issue.

The proposed law would also remove the requirement for law enforcement to obtain the Attorney General's consent before laying hate propaganda charges, allowing for quicker action against hate speech.

While this may enhance the ability to combat hate crimes, it raises concerns about the potential for misuse and the suppression of legitimate discourse.

The Bloc Quebecois has shown interest in supporting the bill, but their willingness to do so hinges on the removal of the current exemptions for religious expression.

This has led to fears among religious groups that the bill could criminalize aspects of their faith, including references to sacred texts like the Bible, Qur'an, and Torah.

Conservative leaders have voiced strong opposition to the bill, arguing that it could lead to the criminalization of religious beliefs and practices.

As the debate continues, the implications of Bill C-9 for religious freedom and free speech are becoming increasingly clear.

The potential for a chilling effect on religious expression could deter individuals from openly discussing their beliefs, fearing legal repercussions.

This concern is echoed by various commentators who warn that the legislation could lead to a broader societal censorship of religious views.

In conclusion, while the intent behind Bill C-9 is to combat hate and protect vulnerable communities, the potential consequences for religious freedom and free speech cannot be overlooked.

As Canada navigates this complex issue, it is crucial to ensure that any measures taken to address hate do not infringe upon the fundamental rights of individuals to express their beliefs freely.

The ongoing discussions surrounding this legislation will likely shape the future landscape of religious expression in Canada, making it a pivotal moment for both faith communities and advocates of free speech.

Topic

Religion

Recent articles:

The Weaponization of Christianity by American Nationalists

Finding Meaning in Christmas Amid Global Turmoil

Inviting Meaning to Your Christmas Feast Amid Turmoil

Cracks in Trump's MAGA Coalition Over Religious Issues

NFL Players Call for Action Against Religious Persecution in Nigeria

Canada's Proposed Hate Speech Law: Implications for Religious Freedom

Politics and Morality in the Israel Debate

Navigating the Complexities of Morality and Politics in Israel Debate

Trump Administration's Religious Influence on Government Policies

Mainstream Antisemitism: A Celebrity-Backed Concern

Paxton Sues Texas Housing Agency Over Religious Discrimination

Texas Faith Fest: Lawmakers Urge Pastors to Preach Politics Amid Christian Nationalism Surge

Charlie Kirk's Political Legacy Sparks Debate Amid Tragic Death

AI Psychosis: How ChatGPT Fuels New Religions

Trump’s 'Climate Religion' Claim: A Political Dodge

Trump's Religious Liberty Commission Meeting Sparks Controversy Over Church-State Boundaries

Trump's 'Climate Religion' Claim Seen as Political Dodge

UO Faculty Union Pushes Back Against Humanities Budget Cuts

Government Support for Religion Doesn't Necessarily Boost Religious Participation