The Trump administration's recent decision to cancel federal grants for mental health services has left New Hampshire providers and school districts in disarray. The abrupt termination affects critical funding aimed at supporting mental health initiatives, leading to potential layoffs and reduced services for students.

## Trump Administration Cancels Mental Health Grants in New Hampshire

The Trump administration's decision to terminate federal grants supporting mental health services has significantly impacted New Hampshire providers and school districts.

This abrupt cancellation, announced on a Tuesday, affects funding from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, which is crucial for individuals facing addiction, homelessness, and mental illness.

Estimates suggest that as much as $2 billion in grants may have been terminated overnight, leaving many organizations scrambling to adjust to the sudden loss of resources.

Susan Stearns, the executive director for NAMI New Hampshire, confirmed that they received notification of the grant terminations, which included contracts for crisis prevention training for first responders and funding through the Children's Mental Health Initiative.

"This leaves people scrambling," Stearns stated, highlighting the urgency of the situation for community mental health centers that rely on these funds.

School districts, including Concord and Manchester, have also been affected.

Pam Walsh, chair of the Concord School Board, reported receiving a letter late Tuesday evening indicating that several grants for mental health and substance misuse services were canceled because they no longer aligned with the administration's priorities.

The letter did not specify what those priorities were, leaving many in the district confused and concerned.

The Manchester School District confirmed that they received a termination letter early Wednesday morning, resulting in a loss of $4.8 million for essential mental health services.

Superintendent Jennifer Chimel noted that in the past six months, mental health clinicians referred over 1,500 students to intervention teams for issues such as anxiety, depression, and substance use.

The grant was intended to support eight positions and was set to run through 2028.

In response to the funding cuts, Chimel stated, "We will work closely with the Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester to continue uninterrupted mental health services in our schools." She emphasized the importance of maintaining communication with other affected districts, such as Concord and Laconia.

The abrupt discontinuation of these grants has raised alarms among state officials and mental health advocates.

A coalition of Democratic state officials has filed a lawsuit against the US Department of Education, arguing that the termination of approximately $1 billion in mental health funding violates federal law and regulations.

The lawsuit claims that without these funds, many children in rural and lower-income schools will go without necessary mental health services, leading to severe consequences such as increased absenteeism, lower academic performance, and a heightened risk of suicide and drug overdose.

The Education Department's decision to halt funding for these mental health programs has drawn criticism from various quarters, including bipartisan lawmakers.

The grants were initially authorized by Congress in the 2022 Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, which aimed to enhance mental health support in schools following tragic events like the Uvalde school shooting.

As the situation develops, school districts like Concord are left in a state of uncertainty regarding their funding.

Ellen Desmond, the district's grant manager, expressed concern over the lack of confirmation about approximately $2.5 million in grant money that was previously awarded for mental health initiatives.

Although a spokesperson from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration indicated that there would be no disruption to funding, discrepancies in communication have left districts on edge.

The implications of these funding cuts extend beyond immediate financial concerns.

The loss of mental health resources could have long-term effects on students' well-being and academic success.

As districts prepare for the upcoming school year, the uncertainty surrounding federal funding continues to pose significant challenges for educators and mental health providers alike.

In summary, the Trump administration's abrupt cancellation of mental health grants has created a crisis for New Hampshire's school districts and mental health providers.

The potential consequences of these funding cuts could be dire, affecting the mental health services available to students and the overall educational environment in the state.

Trump Administration Cancels Mental Health Grants in New Hampshire

trump-administration-cancels-mental-health-grants-in-new-hampshire

The White House has reversed a decision to cut $2 billion in federal grants for mental health and addiction services, which had threatened numerous programs across the country. This move comes amid widespread concern over the ongoing drug crisis and the need for continued support for vulnerable populations.

## White House Reverses $2 Billion Cut to Mental Health Grants

In a significant policy reversal, the White House has decided to restore $2 billion in federal grants that support mental health and addiction services, which had been previously cut by the Trump administration.

This decision comes as public health experts and advocates express deep concern over the ongoing drug crisis in the United States, which has been exacerbated by funding reductions to essential services.

The cuts, which were announced late Tuesday, had targeted over 2,000 discretionary grants distributed by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

These grants are crucial for programs addressing addiction treatment, mental health care, homelessness, and suicide prevention.

The abrupt cancellation of funding had left many organizations scrambling to find alternative sources of support, with some facing immediate layoffs and service disruptions.

Ryan Hampton, founder of the nonprofit Mobilize Recovery, highlighted the dire consequences of the cuts, stating that the loss of funding would leave communities defenseless against the ongoing overdose crisis.

He emphasized that the cuts would dismantle the recovery infrastructure built over years, potentially leading to preventable deaths.

The decision to reverse the cuts has been met with relief from various stakeholders, including politicians and nonprofit leaders who had been vocal in their opposition to the funding reductions.

Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont criticized the initial cuts as a threat to essential services, stating that they jeopardized care for vulnerable residents.

Similarly, US Senator Patty Murray expressed that the administration's claims of addressing the opioid crisis were undermined by the cuts, calling for bipartisan support to ensure the restoration of funding.

The funding restoration is seen as a critical step in addressing the mental health and addiction crises that have plagued the nation.

Public health advocates argue that sustained investment in these services is essential for preventing further loss of life and supporting individuals in recovery.

As the nation grapples with the ongoing challenges posed by addiction and mental health issues, the reversal of these cuts may provide a much-needed lifeline for organizations dedicated to helping those in need.

The decision underscores the importance of federal support in combating the drug epidemic and ensuring access to vital health services.

In conclusion, the White House's decision to reverse the $2 billion cuts to mental health and addiction grants reflects a recognition of the critical role these services play in addressing the ongoing crises.

As communities begin to recover from the impacts of these cuts, the focus will now shift to ensuring that funding remains stable and that programs can continue to provide essential support to those affected by addiction and mental health challenges.

White House Reverses $2 Billion Cut to Mental Health Grants

white-house-reverses-2-billion-cut-to-mental-health-grants

The Trump administration has terminated hundreds of SAMHSA grants, impacting mental health and addiction services across the US Advocates warn that this abrupt action could disrupt essential care for vulnerable populations, with potential consequences for overdose prevention and mental health support.

## Trump Administration Cuts SAMHSA Grants, Endangering Mental Health Services

The Trump administration has abruptly terminated hundreds of federal grants from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), a move that threatens mental health and addiction services nationwide.

This decision has raised alarms among advocates and service providers, who warn that it could disrupt critical care for some of the country's most vulnerable populations.

Late Tuesday, nonprofit organizations across the US began receiving termination letters notifying them that their grants were canceled effective immediately.

These grants fund a wide range of services, including overdose prevention, naloxone distribution, peer recovery support, and outreach to individuals experiencing homelessness and serious mental illness.

Early estimates suggest that approximately $2 billion in grants were terminated overnight, despite bipartisan congressional support for expanding mental health funding amid rising overdose deaths and suicide rates.

Gillison Jr, CEO of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), expressed deep concern over the cuts, stating, "These cuts are disheartening and cruel, and they threaten the life-saving work of hundreds of organizations that provide critical mental health support across the United States." He emphasized that these decisions have real and harmful consequences for millions of people and communities.

The termination notices specify that grants are terminated as of January 13, warning that "costs resulting from financial obligations incurred after termination are not allowable," leaving organizations little time to wind down operations or secure alternative funding.

Ryan Hampton, founder of Mobilize Recovery, highlighted the immediate impact, stating, "Waking up to nearly $2 billion in grant cancellations means frontline providers are forced to cease overdose prevention, naloxone distribution, and peer recovery services immediately, leaving our communities defenseless against a raging crisis." He warned that the consequences of these cuts could be measured in lives lost.

The National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors reported that more than 2,000 grants nationwide are affected, and they are still assessing the full scope of the cuts and their implications for community-based services.

This move comes amid broader federal actions affecting behavioral health funding, including significant Medicaid cuts passed by the Republican-controlled Congress last year, which have already strained many mental health and addiction treatment providers.

The cuts also coincide with the federal government's promotion of the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline as a cornerstone of the nation's mental health emergency response system.

However, concerns have been raised about the capacity and oversight of this system, especially after reports of layoffs at the agency responsible for overseeing it.

Advocacy groups are mobilizing to demand that the federal government protect the funding that underpins the mental health and substance use safety net.

They argue that these programs save lives and stabilize communities, and they are essential to public health and recovery.

The abrupt cancellation of SAMHSA grants threatens critical services that communities rely on every day, including peer support, naloxone distribution, crisis response, and recovery services.

As the situation develops, many organizations are urging affected providers to share their experiences to inform advocacy efforts with congressional leaders and state officials.

The immediate impact of these grant terminations could be felt on the streets and in emergency departments within days, as programs scale back or shut down altogether.

In summary, the termination of SAMHSA grants by the Trump administration poses a significant threat to mental health and addiction services across the United States.

The abrupt nature of these cuts, combined with existing funding challenges, raises serious concerns about the future of the nation's behavioral health safety net and the lives it supports.

Trump Administration Cuts SAMHSA Grants, Endangering Mental Health Services

trump-administration-cuts-samhsa-grants-endangering-mental-health-services

The Trump administration has abruptly canceled nearly $2 billion in federal grants for mental health and addiction treatment programs, impacting thousands of organizations nationwide. Experts warn that these cuts will exacerbate the ongoing addiction crisis and jeopardize vital services for vulnerable populations.

## Trump Administration Cuts Mental Health and Addiction Grants

The Trump administration has made significant cuts to federal funding for mental health and addiction treatment programs, terminating approximately 2,706 grants valued at around $1.9 billion from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

This decision has raised alarms among health experts and advocates, who argue that it will worsen the ongoing addiction crisis in the United States.

The abrupt cancellations were reportedly initiated by political appointees within the Trump administration, rather than career officials at SAMHSA, which is part of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

A termination notice sent to grant recipients indicated that the agency aimed to "better prioritize agency resources" to address rising rates of mental illness and substance abuse, despite many of the canceled grants directly supporting these priorities.

Among the terminated grants is a $15 million annual funding allocation for the Opioid Response Network, which provides essential training and education for local authorities managing substance use interventions.

Another significant cut includes a $6 million grant for the Building Communities of Recovery program, which supports long-term recovery resources for individuals with substance use disorders.

Experts have expressed deep concern over the implications of these funding cuts.

Keith Humphreys, an addiction policy researcher at Stanford University, stated that the abrupt nature of the cuts could lead to layoffs and disruptions in treatment services, potentially leaving many without the help they need.

He emphasized that the timing of these cuts is particularly troubling, as the nation continues to grapple with high rates of overdose deaths linked to substances like fentanyl.

The funding cuts come on the heels of previous reductions in Medicaid, which is a critical source of funding for addiction treatment across the country.

These cuts are expected to take full effect later this year, further straining resources for mental health and addiction services.

Critics of the administration's decision argue that the cuts contradict the stated goals of addressing the addiction crisis.

Daniel Ciccarone, a professor of addiction medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, remarked, "This is going to cost American lives, no doubt," highlighting the potential for increased fatalities due to reduced access to treatment services.

The impact of these cuts is already being felt across various states.

For instance, New York Governor Kathy Hochul noted that her state would lose approximately $300 million in funding, which is crucial for county health departments dealing with the ongoing opioid epidemic and mental health crisis.

Similarly, Colorado's Behavioral Health Administration reported that $250 million in federal cuts could affect up to 60 programs, putting patients at risk of losing access to vital services.

In response to the cuts, many organizations are now facing difficult decisions regarding staffing and program sustainability.

The Baker Center for Children and Families in Boston, which lost $1 million in federal grants, is considering layoffs that could affect care for hundreds of families.

The abrupt nature of these funding cuts has left many grant recipients confused and concerned about the future of their programs.

Jamie Ross, CEO of the PACT Coalition in Las Vegas, expressed disbelief at the justification provided by SAMHSA, stating that their work aligns closely with the agency's priorities.

As the Trump administration continues to restructure HHS and merge SAMHSA into a new organization, the Administration for a Healthy America (AHA), advocates fear that essential programs may be further jeopardized.

The proposed restructuring could eliminate critical services that address addiction and mental health, exacerbating the challenges faced by communities already struggling with these issues.

In conclusion, the recent cuts to mental health and addiction treatment grants by the Trump administration represent a significant setback in the fight against the addiction crisis in the US As experts warn of the potential consequences, the future of vital services hangs in the balance, leaving many vulnerable individuals without the support they desperately need.

Trump Administration Cuts Mental Health and Addiction Grants

trump-administration-cuts-mental-health-and-addiction-grants

The federal government has terminated several crucial mental health grants in North Carolina, impacting programs that support youth and families. The abrupt cancellation, attributed to a shift in federal priorities, has raised concerns about the continuity of essential mental health services across the state.

## Federal Government Ends Key Mental Health Grants in North Carolina

The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS) has confirmed the immediate termination of several federal grants aimed at mental health and substance use services.

This decision, communicated by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) on January 13, has been attributed to a "shift in federal priorities" under the Trump Administration.

The terminated grants include critical programs such as the NC Healthy Transitions for Youth and Young Adults with Serious Mental Disorders, the North Carolina Grants to Prevent Prescription Drug/Opioid Overdose-Related Deaths, and the NC System of Care Expansion.

NCDHHS expressed concern over the sudden loss of funding, stating that it is "harmful to North Carolinians who rely on these services" and disruptive to local providers.

The abrupt cancellation of these grants has raised alarms among mental health advocates and service providers.

NCDHHS is currently assessing the overall impact of these terminations and exploring options to maintain service continuity with existing resources.

The department emphasized its commitment to advocating for those affected by the funding cuts.

This situation is not isolated to North Carolina.

Similar terminations of mental health funding have been reported across the country, with a coalition of 24 attorneys general, including North Carolina's, filing a lawsuit against the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for abruptly ending nearly $12 billion in public health grants.

The lawsuit argues that these terminations lack legal justification and threaten essential public health services, including mental health support.

In addition to the federal cuts, North Carolina schools have also faced significant reductions in mental health funding.

In April, the Department of Education canceled hundreds of millions of dollars in grants that were intended to increase mental health services in schools, including four grants specifically for North Carolina.

The abrupt termination of these funds has left school leaders scrambling to make difficult decisions regarding staffing and service provision as the new school year approaches.

The mental health crisis among students in North Carolina is pressing.

Recent data indicates that nearly 40% of high school students report persistent feelings of sadness and hopelessness, with 20% seriously considering suicide.

The canceled grants were designed to address these alarming trends by providing much-needed mental health resources in schools, where many students first encounter mental health care.

The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, passed in 2022, aimed to enhance mental health services in schools following the tragic Uvalde school shooting.

However, the recent cuts have undermined these efforts, leaving many districts without the necessary support to address the mental health needs of their students.

North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis, a supporter of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, has expressed concern over the funding cuts and is working to ensure that the Department of Education aligns its grant programs with federal civil rights laws while maintaining the intent of the legislation.

The termination of these mental health grants has sparked a broader conversation about the federal government's role in supporting state mental health initiatives.

Advocates argue that the loss of funding not only jeopardizes existing programs but also hinders the development of new initiatives aimed at addressing the growing mental health crisis in North Carolina and beyond.

As the NCDHHS and local providers navigate the fallout from these funding cuts, the future of mental health services in North Carolina remains uncertain.

The department's commitment to advocating for affected individuals will be crucial in the coming months as they seek to mitigate the impact of these abrupt terminations.

In conclusion, the termination of major mental health grants by the federal government poses significant challenges for North Carolina's mental health landscape.

With rising mental health needs among youth and families, the state must find ways to sustain and enhance its mental health services despite the loss of critical funding.

Federal Government Ends Key Mental Health Grants in North Carolina

federal-government-ends-key-mental-health-grants-in-north-carolina

The rising costs of living are increasingly tied to climate change, affecting food prices, housing, and healthcare. As extreme weather events become more frequent, the financial burden on households grows, particularly for low-income communities. Addressing climate change is essential for improving affordability and ensuring a sustainable future.

## Affordability and Climate Change: An Interconnected Crisis

The relationship between affordability and climate change is becoming increasingly evident as rising living costs are directly linked to environmental factors.

Political candidates and policymakers must recognize that climate issues are not just abstract concerns but are deeply intertwined with the everyday financial realities faced by families across the United States.

One of the most pressing issues is the skyrocketing cost of food.

A recent poll indicated that the rising prices of groceries are a significant concern for Americans, surpassing even housing and healthcare costs.

Over the past five years, grocery prices have surged by approximately 25% to 29%, a burden that disproportionately affects low- and middle-income families.

Climate change plays a crucial role in this crisis, as erratic weather patterns disrupt food production, leading to increased prices.

In 2024 alone, extreme weather events in the US resulted in $20.3 billion in losses for farmers, highlighting the economic impact of climate change on food affordability.

Housing costs are also escalating, exacerbated by climate-related factors.

In Colorado, for instance, home insurance premiums have risen by 58% from 2018 to 2023, making the state one of the most expensive markets for home insurance in the country.

This increase is largely driven by the frequency and severity of wildfires, which have become more common due to climate change.

As a result, the cost of owning or renting a home continues to climb, further straining household budgets in an already tight housing market.

Energy costs are another critical area where climate change and affordability intersect.

As temperatures rise, households are forced to use more energy for heating and cooling, leading to higher utility bills.

Utility providers often increase rates to cover the costs of infrastructure upgrades necessary to prevent disasters like wildfires, which further compounds the financial burden on consumers.

The healthcare sector is not immune to these challenges either.

Climate change contributes to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, which in turn lead to increased healthcare costs.

A study by the World Economic Forum estimates that climate change could cost the global economy between $1.7 trillion and $3.1 trillion annually by 2050, factoring in damages to infrastructure, property, agriculture, and human health.

Moreover, the economic impacts of climate change are not just immediate but also long-term.

A report from the Center for Law, Energy & Environment at UC Berkeley indicates that the average American born in 2024 may face an additional $500,000 in costs over their lifetime due to climate change, with those experiencing severe impacts potentially facing up to $1 million.

This financial strain is particularly acute for low-income communities, which often lack the resources to adapt to these changes.

To address these interconnected crises, policymakers must prioritize climate action as a means to enhance affordability.

Transitioning to renewable energy sources can significantly reduce long-term energy costs.

For example, Texas saw a cumulative decrease of $27.8 billion in wholesale electricity costs from 2010 to 2022 due to investments in wind and solar energy.

Supporting local food systems can also mitigate the volatility of grocery prices by reducing reliance on global supply chains vulnerable to climate disruptions.

Furthermore, implementing programs like cap-and-invest can generate revenue for climate action while simultaneously providing financial relief to households.

By requiring corporate polluters to pay for their emissions, states can fund initiatives that improve energy efficiency and public health, ultimately benefiting low-income communities most affected by climate change.

In conclusion, the affordability crisis and climate change are inextricably linked, and addressing one requires action on the other.

As the midterm elections approach, voters should demand that candidates prioritize climate change in their platforms, recognizing it as a critical issue that affects the cost of living for all Americans.

By taking decisive action, we can create a more affordable and sustainable future for everyone.

Affordability and Climate Change: An Interconnected Crisis

affordability-and-climate-change-an-interconnected-crisis

The Trump administration has terminated hundreds of federal grants supporting mental health and addiction services, potentially cutting $2 billion in funding. Advocates warn that this abrupt action could dismantle critical support systems for vulnerable populations, leading to severe consequences for frontline care providers.

## Trump Administration Cuts $2 Billion in Mental Health Grants

The Trump administration has sent shockwaves through the US mental health and drug addiction system by terminating hundreds of federal grants that support essential health services.

This abrupt decision, effective immediately, could result in cuts totaling approximately $2 billion, affecting numerous nonprofit organizations that provide critical care to individuals facing addiction, homelessness, and mental illness.

Nonprofit organizations across the country began receiving termination letters from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) late Tuesday, indicating that their grants were canceled without prior notice.

These grants fund a variety of services, including overdose prevention, naloxone distribution, and peer recovery support, which are vital for communities grappling with mental health crises and substance use disorders.

Ryan Hampton, founder of Mobilize Recovery, expressed grave concerns about the impact of these cuts, stating that his organization lost approximately $500,000 "overnight." He emphasized that the cancellation of nearly $2 billion in grants means that frontline providers will be forced to cease critical services immediately, leaving communities vulnerable to a worsening crisis.

Hampton warned that the consequences of these cuts would be measured in lives lost as recovery centers close and the safety net for those in need is dismantled.

The National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors has indicated that over 2,000 grants nationwide are affected by this decision.

The organization is currently assessing the full scope of the cuts and their implications for community-based services.

This move comes on the heels of significant Medicaid cuts passed by the Republican-controlled Congress last year, which have already strained many mental health and addiction treatment providers, particularly those serving low-income populations.

Experts in the field are alarmed by the potential unraveling of the nation's behavioral health safety net.

Andrew Kessler, head of Slingshot Solutions, a consultancy firm that works with mental health and addiction groups, noted that the loss of funding could lead to a severe reduction in frontline capacity, with some programs potentially shutting down immediately.

He has reviewed numerous grant termination letters from various cities across the country, highlighting the widespread nature of the cuts.

Regina LaBelle, a Georgetown University professor and former acting head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, emphasized the critical nature of the services funded by SAMHSA grants.

She stated that continued federal funding is essential for lifesaving services, especially in light of the ongoing overdose epidemic, which has been declared a public health emergency.

LaBelle argued that this is not the time to withdraw critical funding, as overdose deaths are on the rise and communities are in desperate need of support.

The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has also condemned the cuts, stating that the elimination of programs administered by the APA Workforce Development Initiative and the APA Foundation's Notice.

at School Program will have catastrophic effects.

Miskimen Rivera, APA President, noted that these overnight cuts place millions of Americans with unmet mental health and substance use disorder needs at even greater risk.

The APA has called for the immediate reinstatement of funding to support the vital pathways for psychiatrists to serve those in need, particularly in underserved areas and schools.

As the situation develops, advocacy groups are mobilizing to demand that the federal government uphold its commitments to mental health and substance use services.

The abrupt cancellation of these grants threatens to disrupt years of bipartisan efforts to strengthen the nation's behavioral health system, putting countless lives at stake.

Providers and advocates are urging the administration to reconsider these cuts and restore funding to ensure that essential services remain available to those who need them most.

The immediate impact of these grant terminations is expected to be felt across the country, with providers warning that the consequences could manifest in emergency departments and on the streets within days.

As organizations scramble to adjust to the sudden loss of funding, the future of mental health and addiction services hangs in the balance, raising urgent questions about the administration's commitment to public health and safety.

Trump Administration Cuts $2 Billion in Mental Health Grants

trump-administration-cuts-2-billion-in-mental-health-grants

The Trump administration has enacted significant cuts to mental health and addiction funding, totaling nearly $2 billion. Experts warn that these reductions will exacerbate the ongoing addiction crisis in the US, jeopardizing vital services and support for those in need.

## Trump Administration Cuts $2 Billion in Mental Health Funding

The Trump administration has reportedly slashed nearly $2 billion in federal funding for mental health and addiction programs, a move that experts warn will worsen the ongoing addiction crisis in the United States.

The cuts primarily affect grants from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), with estimates suggesting that as many as 2,800 grants could be canceled.

The funding reductions began in early April with the abrupt cancellation of several grants, including those to the Vera Institute of Justice and the Maine Department of Corrections.

By April 22, the Department of Justice (DOJ) had terminated 365 awards, citing a shift in agency priorities.

These priorities include combatting violent crime and supporting victims of trafficking, but critics argue that the cuts to mental health and addiction services contradict these goals.

Daniel Ciccarone, a professor of addiction medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, stated, "This is going to cost American lives, no doubt." He emphasized that the cuts come at a time when overdose deaths had recently begun to decline, suggesting that federal investment in treatment and prevention was effective.

The cuts are expected to severely impact addiction treatment services, including access to naloxone, a medication that reverses opioid overdoses, and other critical support systems for individuals struggling with substance use disorders.

The Drug Policy Alliance and the Legal Action Center have been tracking these funding threats, highlighting the potential for increased wait times and reduced services for those seeking help.

In addition to the immediate effects on treatment services, the cuts could undermine long-term efforts to address the addiction crisis.

Caleb Banta-Green, a research professor at the University of Washington, noted that treating substance use disorders is crucial for reducing demand for drugs, which in turn impacts drug trafficking and manufacturing.

Topic

Health

Recent articles:

White House Reverses $2 Billion Cut to Mental Health Grants

Trump Administration Cuts SAMHSA Grants, Endangering Mental Health Services

Trump Administration Cuts Mental Health and Addiction Grants

Federal Government Ends Key Mental Health Grants in North Carolina

Affordability and Climate Change: An Interconnected Crisis

Trump Administration Cuts $2 Billion in Mental Health Grants

Trump Administration Cuts $2 Billion in Mental Health Funding

Trump Administration Cuts $2 Billion from Mental Health Programs

2026 Legislative Priorities: Health Care, Housing, and Workforce

NVIDIA and Natera Collaborate on AI for Precision Medicine

Top 10 U.S. Jobs for 2026 with Salaries Over $100,000

North Dakota Lawmakers Prepare for Rural Health Transformation Fund Session

The Ongoing Mental Health Impact of COVID-19

Georgia Public Health Board Delays Meetings Amid Health Concerns

5 Real Benefits of Video Games for Mental Health

Concerns Rise Over OpenAI's ChatGPT Health and Patient Safety

RFK Jr.'s Health Directives: Implications for Public Health Policy

Evaluating ChatGPT Health: Pros and Cons in Medicine

Bill Gates Advocates for Climate and Children's Health Funding