President Donald Trump has enacted a 25% tariff on certain advanced AI chips, including Nvidia's H200 and AMD's MI325X, citing national security concerns. The move aims to bolster domestic semiconductor production and reduce reliance on foreign supply chains.

## Trump Imposes 25% Tariff on Select AI Chips

President Donald Trump has officially imposed a 25% tariff on certain advanced computing chips, specifically targeting the Nvidia H200 AI processor and AMD's MI325X semiconductor.

This decision, announced on January 14, 2023, is part of a broader strategy to enhance national security and stimulate domestic semiconductor manufacturing.

The proclamation follows a nine-month investigation conducted under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows the president to impose tariffs on imports that threaten national security.

The investigation revealed that the US currently manufactures only about 10% of the semiconductors it requires, making it heavily reliant on foreign supply chains, particularly from countries like Taiwan.

The tariffs will not apply to chips imported for the purpose of building up the US technology supply chain, which raises questions about the criteria for exemption.

The White House has not clarified what specific conditions must be met for these exemptions.

In his announcement, Trump emphasized the importance of reducing dependence on foreign sources for semiconductors, stating that such reliance poses a significant economic and national security risk.

The tariffs are intended to incentivize domestic production and ensure that the US can meet its semiconductor needs without relying on imports.

Nvidia and AMD have responded positively to the tariff announcement, with Nvidia expressing support for the decision as a means to bolster the American chip industry and create high-paying jobs.

However, the implications of these tariffs could lead to increased costs for consumers, as companies may pass on the additional expenses associated with the tariffs to their customers.

The move to impose tariffs on AI chips is part of Trump's broader agenda to position the US as a leader in artificial intelligence technology.

The administration has previously discussed the potential for broader tariffs on semiconductors and their derivative products, indicating that this may be just the beginning of a more extensive trade policy aimed at the tech sector.

Critics of the tariff strategy warn that such measures could lead to higher prices for consumers and disrupt global supply chains.

The tariffs could also complicate relationships with key trading partners, particularly in the semiconductor industry, where many components are sourced from abroad.

As the US navigates these new tariffs, the administration's focus on domestic manufacturing and national security will likely continue to shape its trade policies.

The long-term effects of these tariffs on the semiconductor market and the broader economy remain to be seen, but they underscore the administration's commitment to reshaping the landscape of American manufacturing in the tech sector.

In conclusion, Trump's imposition of a 25% tariff on select AI chips marks a significant step in the ongoing efforts to bolster US manufacturing and address national security concerns.

As the situation develops, stakeholders in the tech industry will be closely monitoring the impact of these tariffs on both domestic production and international trade relations.

Trump Imposes 25% Tariff on Select AI Chips

trump-imposes-25-tariff-on-select-ai-chips

The US economy is exhibiting resilience with solid growth and a strong labor market, despite persistent inflation concerns. Key risks include geopolitical tensions, supply chain vulnerabilities, and potential shifts in consumer behavior. Additionally, updates on monetary policy and consumer sentiment are crucial for understanding future economic conditions.

## U.S. Economy Shows Strength Amid Inflation Risks and Key Updates

The US economy is currently demonstrating notable strength, characterized by solid growth and a robust labor market.

However, persistent inflationary pressures pose significant risks that could impact future economic stability.

As we navigate through these complexities, several key updates and risks warrant attention.

Recent data indicates that the US economy has maintained a strong trajectory, with gross domestic product (GDP) increasing at a solid pace.

The growth has been primarily driven by private domestic final purchases, particularly in personal consumption, which saw a significant rise in retail sales during the third quarter of 2023.

Despite this positive outlook, core inflation remains elevated, hovering around 2.8% as of late 2023, which is above the Federal Reserve's target of 2%.

This persistent inflation is largely attributed to pressures in housing services and other essential goods.

The labor market remains a cornerstone of economic strength, with payroll employment gains rebounding and the unemployment rate stabilizing at a low level of 4.2%.

Job vacancies continue to outnumber unemployed workers, indicating ongoing demand for labor.

However, the labor market dynamics are shifting, with some signs of loosening conditions, which could affect wage growth and consumer spending.

Despite the positive indicators, three major risks could undermine the current economic stability:.

**Geopolitical Tensions**: Ongoing geopolitical issues, particularly in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, could disrupt global supply chains and lead to inflationary pressures on essential commodities like food and energy.

**Supply Chain Vulnerabilities**: The US economy remains susceptible to shocks in global supply chains, which could exacerbate inflation and impact economic growth.

Recent trends suggest that labor strikes and other disruptions could further complicate the supply landscape.

**Consumer Behavior Shifts**: Changes in consumer sentiment, particularly among lower-income households, could lead to reduced spending.

Higher prices for housing, food, and energy have disproportionately affected these groups, potentially leading to a pullback in consumption.

The Federal Reserve has been actively recalibrating its monetary policy in response to these economic conditions.

Following a series of interest rate cuts, the target range for the federal funds rate has been adjusted to reflect the current economic landscape.

The Fed's approach remains data-dependent, with a focus on achieving price stability while supporting maximum employment.

Looking ahead, the economic outlook remains cautiously optimistic.

Analysts expect continued solid growth, supported by strong consumer spending and business investment, particularly in technology sectors driven by artificial intelligence.

However, the potential for inflation to stall or rise remains a concern, necessitating careful monitoring of economic indicators and consumer behavior.

In addition to the economic risks and monetary policy updates, several other factors are shaping the current landscape:.

- **Consumer Sentiment**: Post-election consumer sentiment appears to be improving, although it remains below pre-pandemic levels.

This sentiment is crucial for sustaining consumer spending, which is a significant driver of economic growth.

- **Investment Trends**: Business investment, particularly in technology and AI, is expected to remain strong, contributing to overall economic resilience.

However, there are concerns about potential overcapacity and the sustainability of such investments.

- **Inflation Dynamics**: The inflationary environment is expected to remain sticky, with core inflation projected to stay above the Fed's target for the foreseeable future.

This could limit the central bank's ability to lower interest rates significantly.

In conclusion, while the US economy shows signs of strength, the interplay of inflationary pressures, geopolitical risks, and consumer behavior will be critical in shaping the economic landscape in the coming months.

Policymakers and analysts will need to remain vigilant as they navigate these challenges to ensure sustained economic growth and stability.

U.S. Economy Shows Strength Amid Inflation Risks and Key Updates

u-s-economy-shows-strength-amid-inflation-risks-and-key-updates

President Trump has reaffirmed his intention to acquire Greenland, emphasizing its strategic importance for US national security. This statement follows a tense meeting with Danish and Greenlandic officials, who firmly rejected the notion of selling the territory, highlighting ongoing geopolitical tensions.

## Trump Reiterates Desire for Greenland After High-Stakes Meeting

President Donald Trump has once again expressed his desire for the United States to acquire Greenland, a self-governing territory of Denmark.

His comments came after a high-stakes meeting on January 14, 2025, with Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Greenlandic Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt in Washington, DC.

During a press conference, Trump stated, "Greenland is very important for national security, including of Denmark," and emphasized that Denmark cannot adequately protect the island from potential threats posed by Russia or China.

He further claimed that the US could provide better security for Greenland, referencing recent geopolitical events as evidence of the need for US control.

The meeting, which lasted approximately two hours, revealed significant differences in perspective between the US and its NATO ally Denmark regarding the future governance of Greenland.

While Trump reiterated his belief that the US needs Greenland, Rasmussen described the American position as an "unacceptable breach of sovereignty," asserting that Greenland is "not for sale.".

In the lead-up to the meeting, Trump had taken to social media to argue that NATO would be more effective with Greenland under US control, stating, "Anything less than that is unacceptable." He has consistently framed the acquisition of Greenland as a national security imperative, despite widespread opposition to such a move among the American public.

The Danish and Greenlandic officials expressed their commitment to maintaining the island's sovereignty, with Rasmussen urging for "respectful" cooperation rather than coercion.

They announced the formation of a working group to address security concerns while respecting Denmark's sovereignty, but the fundamental disagreement over the island's status remains unresolved.

Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen emphasized the importance of unity with Denmark in the face of US pressure, stating, "If we have to choose between the US and Denmark here and now, we choose Denmark, NATO, and the EU." This sentiment reflects a growing anxiety among Greenlanders about the potential implications of US interest in their territory.

Public sentiment in Greenland appears to be shifting, with leaders now focusing on the island's relationship with Denmark rather than independence.

Nielsen noted that the current priority is to engage in dialogue with allies rather than gamble with their right to self-determination.

The geopolitical stakes surrounding Greenland are high, with both Russia and China closely monitoring developments.

European leaders, including those from France and Germany, have expressed support for Denmark's territorial integrity, reinforcing the notion that any attempt to alter Greenland's status would have significant repercussions.

As the situation unfolds, the US administration's approach to Greenland continues to provoke strong reactions from both Greenlandic and Danish officials.

The Danish defense ministry has announced plans to increase military presence in the region, signaling a commitment to Arctic security amid rising tensions.

In conclusion, Trump's reiterated desire for Greenland underscores the complex interplay of national security, sovereignty, and international relations in the Arctic.

The ongoing dialogue between the US, Denmark, and Greenland will be crucial in determining the future of this strategically significant territory.

Trump Reiterates Desire for Greenland After High-Stakes Meeting

trump-reiterates-desire-for-greenland-after-high-stakes-meeting

President Trump has proclaimed the start of an 'economic boom' while consumer prices continue to rise, causing concern among Americans. Despite his claims of economic growth, polls indicate that many voters feel the economy has weakened under his administration.

## Trump Declares Economic Boom Amid Rising Consumer Prices

President Donald Trump recently announced that "the Trump economic boom has officially begun," coinciding with a report from the Labor Department indicating that consumer prices have continued to rise during his presidency.

In a speech to the Detroit Economic Club, Trump highlighted his administration's tax cuts, tariffs, and trade deals but did not provide specific details on new measures aimed at controlling prices.

Trump stated that he would unveil additional plans to enhance affordability in the coming weeks, dismissing concerns about rising costs as a "fake word" used by Democrats to shift blame onto him.

He has directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to purchase $200 billion in mortgage bonds to lower rates and has proposed capping credit card interest rates at 10%, significantly lower than current rates.

However, these proposals would require legislative action to be implemented.

Despite Trump's assertions of a booming economy, public sentiment appears to be at odds with his claims.

A recent poll conducted in Michigan revealed that nearly two-thirds of likely voters have noticed rising costs over the past year, with 48% believing the economy has weakened under Trump, compared to 38% who feel it has improved.

This disconnect between Trump's optimistic rhetoric and the public's economic anxiety is expected to play a significant role in the upcoming midterm elections, as both parties focus on economic issues.

At the national level, the Labor Department reported a 2.7% increase in consumer prices from December 2024 to December 2025, prompting Trump to criticize Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell for not cutting interest rates more aggressively.

Trump claimed that "growth is exploding" and that "inflation is defeated," despite evidence suggesting otherwise.

The Federal Reserve has already cut interest rates multiple times in the past year, but not to the extent that Trump desires.

Tensions between the Trump administration and the Federal Reserve have escalated, with Powell accusing Trump of attempting to intimidate him over an investigation related to the agency's office renovations.

Trump has also targeted various political figures, including Democrats and some Republicans, in his remarks, further highlighting the contentious political climate surrounding economic discussions.

As Trump prepares to address the World Economic Forum in Davos, he is expected to provide more details on his housing policies, aiming to ensure that homeownership remains accessible for all Americans.

However, the ongoing rise in consumer prices and the public's dissatisfaction with the economy may overshadow his efforts to promote an image of economic success.

In summary, while President Trump confidently declares the onset of an economic boom, the reality of rising consumer prices and public concern presents a complex challenge for his administration as it approaches the midterm elections.

Trump Declares Economic Boom Amid Rising Consumer Prices

trump-declares-economic-boom-amid-rising-consumer-prices

During his recent speech at the Detroit Economic Club, President Trump made several claims regarding the economy, inflation, and tariffs. This article fact-checks those statements, revealing discrepancies between his assertions and the available data.

## Fact-Checking Trump's Detroit Economic Club Speech

President Donald Trump addressed the Detroit Economic Club on January 13, 2026, where he made several claims about the US economy, inflation, and his administration's achievements.

However, many of his statements were contradicted by recent data and expert analysis.

Trump asserted that the US is experiencing the "strongest and fastest economic turnaround in our country's history." He claimed that inflation has been defeated and that prices for groceries, rent, and other goods are falling.

However, federal data released on the same day indicated that inflation remains steady at 2.7% year-over-year, with grocery prices actually rising by 2.4% compared to the previous year, and a 0.7% increase from November to December 2025.

In his speech, Trump stated, "Grocery prices are starting to go rapidly down," which is misleading given the recent data showing a spike in grocery prices.

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that five of the six major grocery store food group indexes increased in December 2025.

Trump also claimed that "investment is booming" and that "incomes are rising." While there has been some job growth, the pace has slowed, with the economy adding only 584,000 jobs in 2025, the lowest annual figure since 2003, excluding recession years.

Furthermore, average hourly earnings increased by only 1.1% in 2025, which is less than the inflation rate, meaning real wage growth is stagnant for many Americans.

On tariffs, Trump claimed that they are not paid by American consumers but rather by foreign nations.

This assertion is misleading; economists have found that US businesses and consumers bear the brunt of tariff costs, which can lead to higher prices for imported goods.

A December 2025 analysis indicated that tariffs have increased prices, and while some costs may be absorbed by manufacturers, consumers ultimately face higher prices.

Trump also boasted about reducing the trade deficit, stating it had decreased by 39% between September and October 2025.

However, this claim lacks context, as the trade deficit is influenced by various factors, and the long-term effects of tariffs on the economy remain uncertain.

Economists initially predicted that Michigan could lose thousands of jobs due to these tariffs, although later reports suggested a "small positive" impact on domestic auto production.

In discussing his administration's economic policies, Trump claimed, "I've kept all my promises and much more." While he has made progress on some campaign promises, many Michiganders still face high living costs, and his promises to quickly lower prices have not materialized.

The average rent in Michigan has increased significantly, with some areas seeing jumps of nearly 45% since 2015, which contradicts his claims of economic improvement for residents.

Trump's speech also included unverified claims about the 2020 election, suggesting he won Michigan "three times" and that widespread fraud occurred.

These assertions have been debunked by multiple investigations, including one led by Republican state senators, which found no evidence of widespread fraud in Michigan's 2020 election results.

In summary, while Trump highlighted certain economic achievements during his speech, many of his claims were not supported by the latest data.

Inflation remains a significant concern, and the economic recovery has not been as robust as he suggested.

As the 2024 election approaches, these discrepancies may influence voter perceptions of his administration's performance.

Fact-Checking Trump's Detroit Economic Club Speech

fact-checking-trump-s-detroit-economic-club-speech

Neel Kashkari, President of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve, emphasized the crucial role of artificial intelligence infrastructure investment in maintaining economic strength. In a recent discussion, he noted that while the economy shows mixed signals, the growth of data centers and AI technology is a significant driver of demand and investment.

## Minneapolis Fed's Neel Kashkari Highlights AI Investment's Economic Impact

Neel Kashkari, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, recently discussed the importance of artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure investment in sustaining the US economy.

During a conversation with Bob Frenzel, CEO of Xcel Energy, Kashkari noted that the current economic landscape presents mixed signals, yet the investment in AI and data centers remains a bright spot.

Kashkari pointed out that while the labor market appears to be cooling, the stock market is performing well, and there is significant investment in AI technologies.

He expressed optimism about the sectors that the Federal Reserve interacts with, particularly those benefiting from AI infrastructure.

Frenzel highlighted that the growth of data centers is expected to account for approximately 60% of Xcel's anticipated retail sales growth through 2030.

This growth is crucial as it aligns with the broader trend of increasing demand for electricity driven by both data centers and the oil and gas sector.

The conversation also touched on the challenges posed by supply chain disruptions, which have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Kashkari noted that lead times for electrical equipment procurement have significantly increased, complicating the infrastructure development necessary to support this growth.

Frenzel emphasized the need for proactive planning and collaboration with regulators to address these supply chain issues.

He mentioned that the construction of combustion turbine gas plants, for instance, has seen timelines extend from 18 months to as long as five years due to these delays.

In terms of economic outlook, Kashkari remarked that while inflation remains a concern, the investment in AI and data centers could help mitigate some of the economic pressures.

He acknowledged that the Federal Reserve is focused on balancing demand and supply to control inflation, which has been influenced by various factors, including supply chain disruptions and geopolitical events.

Frenzel also discussed the potential for alternative rate structures to protect customers from the financial impacts of overbuilding infrastructure for data centers.

He indicated that Xcel is exploring long-term pricing arrangements with major tech companies to ensure that infrastructure investments are sustainable and beneficial for all customers.

The discussion underscored the critical role of AI infrastructure in shaping the future of the US economy.

As demand for electricity continues to rise, particularly from data centers, the need for robust infrastructure and innovative solutions becomes increasingly important.

In conclusion, both Kashkari and Frenzel conveyed a sense of cautious optimism regarding the economic outlook, driven largely by advancements in AI and the energy sector.

The ongoing investment in these areas is seen as vital for maintaining economic strength and addressing the challenges posed by inflation and supply chain disruptions.

Minneapolis Fed's Neel Kashkari Highlights AI Investment's Economic Impact

minneapolis-fed-s-neel-kashkari-highlights-ai-investment-s-economic-impact

President Trump's proposed 10% cap on credit card interest rates could have detrimental effects on the economy. Experts warn that such a cap may restrict access to credit for millions of Americans, particularly those with lower credit scores, ultimately harming consumers and the broader economy.

## Trump's Credit Card Interest Cap: A Risky Economic Gamble

President Donald Trump's recent proposal to impose a 10% cap on credit card interest rates has sparked significant concern among financial experts and industry leaders.

While the intention behind this move may be to protect consumers from exorbitant interest rates, the potential consequences could be far-reaching and detrimental to the economy.

Currently, the average interest rate on credit cards hovers between 19.65% and 21.5%.

A drastic reduction to 10% would likely result in substantial revenue losses for banks, estimated at around $100 billion annually, according to researchers at Vanderbilt University.

This financial hit could lead banks to tighten their lending practices, particularly for consumers with lower credit scores, who are already at a disadvantage in accessing credit.

JPMorgan Chase's Chief Financial Officer, Jeremy Barnum, has voiced strong opposition to the proposed cap, stating that it could lead to a significant reduction in the availability of credit for millions of Americans.

He warned that the cap would not lower borrowing costs as intended but would instead restrict access to credit, particularly for those who need it most.

This sentiment is echoed by other industry leaders, who argue that the cap could create a "severely negative consequence for consumers and the economy as a whole".

The implications of such a cap extend beyond individual consumers.

Major banks and financial institutions rely on credit card revenue to support their operations and partnerships with various businesses, including airlines and retailers.

For instance, Delta Air Lines has reported that its partnership with American Express generated $8.2 billion in revenue last year, a figure that could be jeopardized by the proposed interest rate cap.

Moreover, the cap could lead to a reduction in the rewards and benefits that consumers currently enjoy.

As banks adjust to the new financial landscape, they may be less willing to offer lucrative rewards programs, which could ultimately diminish consumer spending and economic growth.

LendingTree's chief consumer finance analyst noted that banks would likely become more selective in issuing credit cards, particularly to those with less-than-stellar credit histories, further limiting access to credit for lower-income households.

Critics of the cap also point to the broader economic context.

In 2024, Americans collectively held $1.17 trillion in credit card debt, with many borrowers already struggling to manage their financial obligations.

A cap on interest rates could inadvertently push consumers toward alternative, potentially more expensive forms of credit, such as payday loans, which often carry interest rates as high as 400%.

While the proposal may resonate with voters seeking relief from high-interest debt, it is essential to consider the potential unintended consequences.

Research from the World Bank indicates that interest rate caps below prevailing rates can reduce access to credit, forcing borrowers to seek out higher-cost alternatives or leaving them without credit options altogether.

In conclusion, while President Trump's proposal to cap credit card interest rates may be well-intentioned, it poses significant risks to the economy and consumer access to credit.

Financial experts warn that such a move could lead to reduced lending, diminished rewards for consumers, and ultimately, a negative impact on economic growth.

As policymakers consider this proposal, it is crucial to weigh the potential benefits against the risks to ensure that the needs of consumers are met without jeopardizing the stability of the financial system.

Trump's Credit Card Interest Cap: A Risky Economic Gamble

trump-s-credit-card-interest-cap-a-risky-economic-gamble

This article provides an overview of the countries affected by former President Trump's travel ban, detailing the reasons for their inclusion and the implications for travelers. The ban has expanded over time, impacting visa processing and entry for nationals from various regions.

## Understanding Trump's Travel Ban: A Country Guide

The travel ban initiated by the Trump administration has undergone several expansions, affecting a significant number of countries.

Initially announced in 2017, the ban aimed to restrict entry from nations deemed to have inadequate vetting processes for travelers.

As of January 2025, the list includes 39 countries, with varying degrees of restrictions on visa processing and entry.

The following 17 countries are subject to a full travel ban, prohibiting both immigrant and nonimmigrant visas:.

The rationale for these restrictions often centers on national security concerns, with the administration citing failures in screening and information-sharing as key reasons for the bans.

In addition to the fully banned countries, there are 15 nations that face partial restrictions.

Nationals from these countries may encounter limitations on receiving immigrant visas and certain nonimmigrant categories.

These partial restrictions are often based on similar concerns regarding the ability to properly vet travelers.

The Trump administration's travel ban has been justified by claims of national security threats posed by individuals from these countries.

For instance, the administration has pointed to high rates of visa overstays, lack of cooperation in accepting deportees, and ongoing civil unrest as factors influencing the decision to impose travel restrictions.

Countries like Afghanistan and Syria have been highlighted due to their internal conflicts and the challenges they present in terms of vetting individuals seeking entry into the US The administration has also expressed concerns about the potential for terrorism and crime emanating from these regions.

For individuals from the affected countries, the travel ban has significant implications.

Valid visas and green cards remain usable, but travelers should expect enhanced scrutiny at borders and airports.

New visa applications in banned categories are likely to be denied, and renewals may not be possible for many applicants.

Employers with employees from these countries may face delays or denials in visa appointments, necessitating early action on renewals or extensions.

It is advisable for affected individuals to gather strong identity documents and consult with immigration attorneys to navigate the complexities of the ban.

The travel ban remains a contentious issue, reflecting broader debates about immigration policy and national security in the United States.

As the situation evolves, it is crucial for individuals from affected countries to stay informed about their rights and the implications of the travel restrictions.

Understanding Trump's Travel Ban: A Country Guide

understanding-trump-s-travel-ban-a-country-guide

US stock futures for the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq fell on Wednesday despite positive earnings reports from major banks. Concerns over escalating tensions in Iran, particularly regarding potential military actions, contributed to the market's downturn.

## Stock Market Declines Amid Positive Bank Earnings and Iran Tensions

US stock futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite experienced a decline on Wednesday, even as major banks reported better-than-expected earnings.

The mixed signals from the financial sector were overshadowed by rising geopolitical tensions, particularly concerning Iran's internal unrest and potential US military responses.

The Dow futures dropped by approximately 0.5%, while S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures also saw declines of around 0.4% and 0.6%, respectively.

This downturn occurred despite several banks, including JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs, posting strong quarterly results that exceeded analysts' expectations.

Market analysts noted that the positive earnings reports from banks typically bolster investor confidence; however, the current geopolitical climate has created a more cautious atmosphere.

Topic

Economy

Recent articles:

U.S. Economy Shows Strength Amid Inflation Risks and Key Updates

Trump Reiterates Desire for Greenland After High-Stakes Meeting

Trump Declares Economic Boom Amid Rising Consumer Prices

Fact-Checking Trump's Detroit Economic Club Speech

Minneapolis Fed's Neel Kashkari Highlights AI Investment's Economic Impact

Trump's Credit Card Interest Cap: A Risky Economic Gamble

Understanding Trump's Travel Ban: A Country Guide

Stock Market Declines Amid Positive Bank Earnings and Iran Tensions

Stock Market Retreats as Tech Leads Decline and Banks Slide

Supreme Court Tariff Ruling: Implications for U.S. Trade Volume

Trump Claims Economic Success and Declares Inflation Defeated

Trump's Attacks on the Fed Raise Global Financial Stability Concerns

Affordability and Climate Change: An Interconnected Crisis

Big Banks Report Record Profits Amid Trump Tensions

Supreme Court Declines to Rule on Trump's Tariffs

Stock Market Pauses Ahead of Bank Earnings and Tariff Ruling

Stock Market Today, Jan. 14: Nvidia Leads Tech Losses as Investors Cool on AI

2026 Legislative Priorities: Health Care, Housing, and Workforce

Trump's Proposed 10% Credit Card Interest Cap: Key Considerations