Court Ruling Protects Health Research Funding from Trump Cuts

Jan 7, 2026, 2:21 AM
Image for article Court Ruling Protects Health Research Funding from Trump Cuts

Hover over text to view sources

A federal appeals court has upheld a ruling that blocks the Trump administration from implementing significant cuts to medical research funding, a decision that Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel described as a relief for the state and the nation.
The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a lower court's permanent injunction against the Department of Health and Human Services and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which sought to cut billions of dollars in funding that supports vital medical and public health research at universities and research institutions across the country.
Nessel, who co-led a coalition of 22 state attorneys general in filing the lawsuit on February 10, 2025, emphasized the importance of the ruling. "The Trump administration repeatedly has shown that they will illegally slash funding at the expense of Michiganders, even when that funding supports lifesaving research," she stated.
The lawsuit was initiated shortly after the NIH announced plans to reduce indirect cost reimbursements, which cover essential expenses such as laboratory operations, faculty salaries, and infrastructure costs. These cuts were projected to save the NIH up to $9 billion, but the coalition argued that such reductions would jeopardize ongoing research projects and hinder future medical breakthroughs.
The court's decision is particularly significant as NIH funding has historically been the primary source of federal support for medical research in the United States. This funding has led to numerous scientific advancements, including cancer treatments and the first sequencing of DNA.
Nessel's office highlighted that the cuts would have severely impacted Michigan's research institutions, potentially jeopardizing over $200 million in funding for projects at major universities such as the University of Michigan, Michigan State University, and Wayne State University.
The coalition of attorneys general, which included representatives from states like California, New York, and Illinois, argued that the Trump administration's actions violated federal law, including a directive from Congress that prohibits indiscriminate changes to indirect cost reimbursements.
In her statement, Nessel reaffirmed her commitment to protecting Michigan families and research institutions from what she termed "unlawful and harmful federal actions." She expressed gratitude that the courts have consistently intervened to restore funding and uphold the rule of law.
The ruling not only safeguards funding for current research but also ensures that the US maintains its status as a leader in medical innovation. The NIH's support has been crucial for many groundbreaking discoveries that have improved health outcomes and saved lives across the nation.
As the legal battle continues, the coalition of attorneys general remains vigilant in their efforts to protect essential funding for medical research, emphasizing the critical role that such funding plays in advancing public health and scientific discovery.
The court's decision marks a significant victory for advocates of medical research and public health, ensuring that vital funding remains intact for the foreseeable future.

Related articles

Former CDC Director Warns of Public Health Crisis

Former CDC director Tom Frieden highlights political interference and staffing cuts undermining public health. Trump-era policies have decimated CDC programs, risking national health security.

Supreme Court Lets Trump Admin Cut Off Health Grants Linked to DEI Policies

The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to halt NIH grants tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. The 5-4 decision permits funding cuts while legal battles continue, raising concerns about research on minority health disparities.

Hegseth Unveils Plans to Transform DOD's AI and Tech Hubs

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has announced a comprehensive strategy to enhance the Department of Defense's capabilities in artificial intelligence and other advanced technologies. This initiative aims to create a unified innovation ecosystem to accelerate the military's technological advancements and improve operational efficiency.

Trump Administration Cancels Mental Health Grants in New Hampshire

The Trump administration's recent decision to cancel federal grants for mental health services has left New Hampshire providers and school districts in disarray. The abrupt termination affects critical funding aimed at supporting mental health initiatives, leading to potential layoffs and reduced services for students.

White House Reverses $2 Billion Cut to Mental Health Grants

The White House has reversed a decision to cut $2 billion in federal grants for mental health and addiction services, which had threatened numerous programs across the country. This move comes amid widespread concern over the ongoing drug crisis and the need for continued support for vulnerable populations.