Trump Slams Justices, Unveils New 10% Tariff After Supreme Court Ruling

Feb 23, 2026, 2:32 AM

Hover over text to view sources

President Donald Trump launched a scathing attack on Supreme Court justices after they ruled against his administration's international trade tariffs. During a White House briefing, Trump referred to the justices as "fools" and expressed his disappointment over their decision, which he characterized as a "terrible, defective decision." The ruling, which was a 6-3 vote, significantly undermined his economic strategy centered on tariffs, a key aspect of his "America First" agenda.

In response to this setback, Trump announced that he would impose a new 10% tariff on imports worldwide, using an executive order that allows such tariffs under a 1974 law. This law, however, limits the duration of the tariffs to 150 days, requiring congressional approval for any extension. Trump dismissed concerns about this limitation, asserting, "We have a right to do pretty much what we want to do".

The president's comments reflect his view that tariffs are essential for the US economy. He has maintained that they would ultimately increase national wealth and provide leverage in trade negotiations, despite evidence suggesting that the costs of these tariffs are primarily borne by American consumers and businesses.

Trump's reaction also highlighted his frustration with institutional checks on his power. He described the ruling from the Supreme Court as a "disgrace," particularly criticizing Justices Neil M. Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, both of whom he nominated. He expressed shame over their decision, claiming it lacked the courage to support what he believes is right for the country.

Additionally, the president suggested that the ruling was influenced by "Foreign Interests and a Political Movement," although he provided no evidence to support this claim. This sentiment underscores his broader narrative that external forces are working against his administration's policies.

Despite the setback, Trump and his administration appear resolute in their commitment to a robust tariff policy. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent asserted that the court's ruling did not oppose Trump's tariffs outright but rather limited the legal framework under which they could be imposed. He emphasized that Trump's trade agenda would continue, albeit through alternative legal means.

The political implications of Trump's tariff policies are significant, particularly as they collide with the upcoming midterm elections. Recent polls indicate that a majority of Americans oppose Trump's tariffs, with many believing they have contributed to higher consumer prices and slowed economic growth. A Pew Research poll revealed that 60% of respondents disapproved of the tariff increases, a trend that has persisted since April when Trump first proposed sweeping trade measures.

Democrats quickly capitalized on the Supreme Court's ruling, with figures like Senator Elizabeth Warren arguing that the decision does not absolve the damage caused by Trump's tariffs. California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the tariffs as an illegal tax on consumers and urged for accountability regarding the financial burdens they impose on American families.

As Trump continues to push his tariff agenda, some lawmakers within his party have expressed unease. Republican Senator Mitch McConnell labeled Trump's approach as "illegal," emphasizing the necessity of congressional involvement in trade policy. This internal dissent reflects a broader concern that Trump's tariffs are fundamentally at odds with traditional Republican values of free trade.

In conclusion, President Trump's response to the Supreme Court's ruling marks a critical moment in his administration's trade policy, revealing both his combative stance against judicial authority and his determination to use alternative methods to impose tariffs. As the political landscape shifts ahead of the midterm elections, the consequences of these decisions may resonate throughout American economic and political discourse in the months to come.

India Postpones U.S. Trade Talks Amid Tariff Uncertainty

India has delayed sending a trade delegation to the US due to uncertainty following the Supreme Court's rejection of tariffs imposed by former President Trump. The decision affects plans for an interim trade deal that was set to address punitive tariffs on certain Indian exports.

US Trade Chief: Tariff Policy Remains Despite Supreme Court Ruling

Despite a recent Supreme Court ruling declaring many of Donald Trump's tariffs illegal, US trade negotiator Jamieson Greer affirmed that the government will continue its existing tariff policy. This statement comes as the administration seeks to maintain continuity in trade relations, even as public disapproval of tariffs remains high.

U.S. Trade Representative Affirms Commitment to Trade Deals Post-Supreme Court Ruling

Following a Supreme Court ruling that questioned President Trump's tariff authority, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated that the White House intends to uphold existing trade agreements. Despite uncertainties, Greer emphasized that the US expects its global partners to remain committed to their trade deals.

U.S. Importers Continue Paying Trump's Tariffs Post-Supreme Court Ruling

Despite a recent Supreme Court ruling declaring President Trump's tariffs illegal, US importers are still obligated to pay these duties. The ruling raised questions about potential refunds and how the Customs and Border Protection will manage the transition away from these tariffs.

Supreme Court Declares Trump's Emergency Tariffs Illegal

The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump's sweeping emergency tariffs violated federal law, marking a significant setback for his economic policies. The court concluded that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not grant the president the authority to impose such tariffs without congressional approval.