US Trade Chief: Tariff Policy Remains Despite Supreme Court Ruling

Feb 23, 2026, 2:22 AM
Image for article US Trade Chief: Tariff Policy Remains Despite Supreme Court Ruling

Hover over text to view sources

US trade negotiator Jamieson Greer stated on Sunday that the Trump administration's tariff policy will persist, despite the Supreme Court's recent ruling that deemed many of these tariffs illegal. The court's decision, issued two days prior, was a significant setback for Trump's economic agenda, prompting him to announce a new global tariff under different statutes.
Greer emphasized the importance of maintaining consistency in trade policy, asserting, "The reality is, we want to maintain the policy we have, have as much continuity as possible, make sure that business understands this is the direction we've been going." He indicated that while the legal mechanisms to implement tariffs might change, the fundamental policy remains unchanged.
This declaration comes amidst growing public disapproval of the tariff strategy. An ABC/Washington Post/Ipsos poll indicated that 64% of Americans disapprove of tariffs as an economic strategy. Despite this, Greer maintained that tariffs provide the US with significant leverage in global trade.
In a separate interview, Greer noted that the US would not withdraw from existing tariff agreements with various countries, including the UK, the EU, and Japan. He clarified that the newly announced 15% global tariff, which increased from 10% following the Supreme Court ruling, is distinct from prior bilateral agreements made in the past nine months.
Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer responded to the court's ruling by labeling it a victory for American consumers, arguing that Trump's unilateral tariff imposition violated congressional authority. Schumer called for an end to what he described as a reckless trade war, emphasizing the need for relief for families and small businesses affected by tariffs.
The Supreme Court's ruling stated that the authority to enact tariffs lies with Congress under the Constitution, and not with the president during peacetime. Greer acknowledged that the administration might have reduced flexibility regarding emergency tariffs, which the court deemed an inappropriate application of a 1977 emergency powers law.
California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized Trump's tariff policy, describing it as chaotic and detrimental to the economy, citing stagnant GDP growth and rising inflation. He expressed concerns that the administration's approach could lead to further economic instability.
As the administration navigates the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling, it remains committed to its tariff policies, anticipating that the legal landscape surrounding these measures may evolve further. However, Greer indicated that the administration would defer the issue of refunds on previously imposed tariffs to the court of international trade, stating that the Supreme Court's decision offered "zero guidance" on this matter.
In the wake of the ruling, some business leaders expressed relief, claiming it validated their concerns about the tariffs' impact on their operations. Victor Schwartz, a US wine importer involved in one of the legal challenges, expressed his excitement over the court's decision, stating it affirmed their position against the "unprecedented tariffs" that threatened many small businesses.
As the administration proceeds with its tariff strategy, the ongoing debate surrounding the legal authority and economic implications of such measures continues to unfold, with significant ramifications for US trade relations and the broader economy.
The Trump administration's commitment to its tariff policies, even in the face of legal challenges, underscores the administration's broader strategy to encourage domestic production and reduce trade imbalances. However, the effectiveness and sustainability of this approach remain under scrutiny as both domestic and international stakeholders await further developments.

Related articles

U.S. Trade Representative Affirms Commitment to Trade Deals Post-Supreme Court Ruling

Following a Supreme Court ruling that questioned President Trump's tariff authority, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated that the White House intends to uphold existing trade agreements. Despite uncertainties, Greer emphasized that the US expects its global partners to remain committed to their trade deals.

U.S. Importers Continue Paying Trump's Tariffs Post-Supreme Court Ruling

Despite a recent Supreme Court ruling declaring President Trump's tariffs illegal, US importers are still obligated to pay these duties. The ruling raised questions about potential refunds and how the Customs and Border Protection will manage the transition away from these tariffs.

Supreme Court Declares Trump's Emergency Tariffs Illegal

The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump's sweeping emergency tariffs violated federal law, marking a significant setback for his economic policies. The court concluded that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not grant the president the authority to impose such tariffs without congressional approval.

Supreme Court's Ruling Disrupts Trump's Tariff Plans

The Supreme Court's recent decision to invalidate tariffs imposed by President Trump has raised significant concerns about the future of his economic agenda. Trump has vowed to explore alternative measures to implement tariffs, but acknowledges the complexities involved following the ruling.

Toy CEO Rick Woldenberg Speaks Out After Supreme Court Victory

Rick Woldenberg, CEO of Learning Resources, reflects on the recent Supreme Court ruling that overturned many of President Trump's tariffs. He discusses the financial burden the tariffs placed on his toy manufacturing business and the implications of the court's decision for the industry.