Senate Committee Delays Crypto Bill After Coinbase CEO's Opposition

Jan 16, 2026, 2:38 AM
Image for article Senate Committee Delays Crypto Bill After Coinbase CEO's Opposition

Hover over text to view sources

The US Senate Banking Committee has postponed a scheduled discussion on a significant cryptocurrency regulatory framework, following public objections from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong. The committee was set to debate the bill, known as the Clarity Act, which aims to define the classification of crypto tokens and assign regulatory authority over spot crypto markets to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
Chairman Tim Scott announced the postponement, describing it as a temporary pause while negotiations continue. He emphasized that discussions with industry leaders and colleagues from both parties are ongoing, stating, "Everyone remains at the table working in good faith".
Armstrong's opposition was a pivotal factor in the delay. He expressed that Coinbase could not support the bill in its current form, citing "too many issues," including a de facto ban on tokenized equities and concerns over the erosion of CFTC authority. He also criticized provisions that would eliminate rewards for stablecoin holders, stating, "We'd rather have no bill than a bad bill".
The Clarity Act, unveiled earlier in the week, is the result of a prolonged lobbying effort by Coinbase and other major crypto firms, which argue that clear regulations are essential for the industry's growth and legal clarity. However, Armstrong's recent comments have raised doubts about the bill's viability, particularly without Coinbase's backing, which has been instrumental in the negotiations and has contributed millions to political action committees supporting pro-crypto candidates in the upcoming elections.
The bill's provisions have sparked debate among lawmakers, particularly regarding stablecoin regulations. It prohibits crypto companies from paying interest solely for holding stablecoins but allows for rewards tied to specific activities, such as transactions or loyalty programs. This aspect has drawn criticism from banks, which argue that it could lead to a significant outflow of deposits from traditional banking systems, potentially threatening financial stability.
Despite the setback, Chairman Scott remains optimistic about the bill's future, asserting that bipartisan support is crucial for its passage. He noted that the committee has incorporated many Democratic priorities into the legislation, addressing concerns related to anti-money laundering and consumer protection, which are critical for both parties.
The postponement of the markup raises questions about the timeline for the Clarity Act, especially as the House of Representatives has already passed its version of the bill. The Senate will need to navigate these complexities to ensure that the legislation can advance, particularly as it requires support from at least seven Democrats to pass out of committee.
As discussions continue, industry stakeholders are hopeful that a revised version of the bill can be crafted that addresses the concerns raised by Armstrong and others. The White House has also expressed its commitment to working with the Senate Banking Committee to finalize a regulatory framework that balances innovation with consumer protection in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape.
In conclusion, the delay in the Senate Banking Committee's discussion of the Clarity Act highlights the challenges of creating a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. With key industry players like Coinbase voicing significant concerns, the path forward will require careful negotiation and collaboration among lawmakers and stakeholders to achieve a balanced approach that fosters growth while ensuring consumer safety.

Related articles

Senate Finance Leaders Demand Clarity from SSA on Data Practices

Senate Finance Committee leaders are pressing the Social Security Administration for clearer data handling practices following revelations about the Department of Government Efficiency's mishandling of sensitive information. A recent court filing has raised serious concerns about potential violations of privacy policies and compliance issues.

California Crypto Startup BitGo Relocates to South Dakota Amid Wealth Tax Debate

BitGo, a California-based cryptocurrency startup, has moved its headquarters to South Dakota as concerns over a proposed wealth tax in California escalate. The Billionaire Tax Act aims to impose a 5% tax on residents worth over $1 billion, prompting backlash from business leaders and influencing relocations within the tech sector.

Americans Cautious with AI in Finance, Open to Political Influence

A recent analysis reveals a stark contrast in American attitudes towards AI in finance and politics. While most Americans are hesitant to allow AI to manage their financial assets, they are more accepting of AI's role in shaping political opinions, even when faced with misinformation.

Elon Musk Sues Apple, OpenAI Over Antitrust Allegations

Elon Musk's lawsuit accuses Apple and OpenAI of anticompetitive practices by integrating ChatGPT into iOS. The case claims the partnership stifles innovation in AI chatbots and smartphone markets, with both companies denying the allegations.

Musk Seeks Zuckerberg’s Help for OpenAI Takeover Bid, Court Files Reveal

Elon Musk allegedly approached Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to help finance a $97.4 billion bid to acquire OpenAI, according to court filings. The lawsuit highlights tensions over OpenAI’s for-profit restructuring and Musk’s legal claims of breach of contract.