PG County Settles Lawsuit with Muslim Chaplain Over Discrimination

Jan 29, 2026, 2:48 AM
Image for article PG County Settles Lawsuit with Muslim Chaplain Over Discrimination

Hover over text to view sources

Prince George's County has reached a settlement in a federal lawsuit involving Imam Edrees Bridges, who alleged religious discrimination when applying for a chaplaincy position at the county jail. The county will pay Bridges $195,000 and restore him as a volunteer chaplain, as part of the settlement agreement reached just before a trial was set to begin in federal court.
Bridges, who has a background as a special agent for the US Capitol Police, initially served as a volunteer chaplain at the Prince George's County Correctional Center starting in 2018. However, he had to stop due to the pandemic. The legal troubles began when Bridges was encouraged by the executive director of Prison Ministry of America (PMA), a Christian nonprofit contracted by the county, to apply for a supervisory chaplain position. Upon reviewing the application, Bridges found it required him to sign a "Statement of Applicant's Christian Faith," which he felt was discriminatory given his Muslim beliefs.
Imam Bridges subsequently filed a lawsuit in 2021, claiming the job application violated his First Amendment rights, specifically the free exercise of religion and the separation of church and state. The county, through its representatives, initially stated it was unaware of the Christian requirement in the application process. Nonetheless, legal experts argued that the requirement was clear and effectively barred Bridges from applying for a position that should have been open to all qualified candidates, regardless of their faith.
The settlement not only involves financial compensation but also includes a commitment from PMA to refrain from using similar religious hiring requirements in the future. The county's agreement to reinstate Bridges as a volunteer chaplain is seen as a significant step towards fostering inclusive practices within the correctional facility.
John Fossum, a staff attorney with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which represented Bridges, emphasized the importance of this case as a matter of religious freedom. He stated, “The First Amendment protects all of us,” highlighting that the outcome serves to uphold the constitutional rights of individuals in similar situations.
Bridges expressed gratitude for the resolution, viewing it as a victory not only for himself but for all chaplains and individuals advocating for religious freedom in the United States. He remarked, “This is an important victory for all chaplains and all those who believe in upholding our collective constitutionally-protected right to religious freedom in our country.”.
The implications of this case extend beyond Bridges' individual experience, as it raises broader questions about the treatment of religious minorities in correctional facilities and the importance of ensuring that religious services are provided without discrimination. The settlement is a step towards ensuring that incarcerated individuals have access to diverse religious support, which is essential for their spiritual well-being.
As the county moves forward, it is expected that the lessons learned from this case will influence future policies regarding the hiring of chaplains and the provision of religious services in correctional facilities across the nation. The commitment to equality and inclusivity in religious practices reflects a growing recognition of the diverse faith backgrounds of both staff and inmates in the correctional system.
In conclusion, the resolution of Imam Edrees Bridges' lawsuit marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing fight for religious equality within institutional settings, reinforcing the necessity for policies that respect the rights of all individuals, regardless of their faith.

Related articles

Don Lemon's Arrest Ignites Free Speech and Religious Freedom Debate

The arrest of former CNN anchor Don Lemon has sparked a national conversation regarding the balance between free speech rights and religious freedom. Charged with conspiracy related to a disruptive protest at a church, Lemon's case raises critical questions about the boundaries of protest and the protection of religious practices.

Don Lemon Vows to Fight Federal Charges After Church Protest Arrest

Journalist Don Lemon has promised to vigorously contest federal charges stemming from his arrest during a protest at a Minnesota church. Released on recognizance, Lemon and fellow journalist Georgia Fort face accusations of violating worshippers' rights while documenting the anti-ICE demonstration.

Action Alert: Congress Urged to Safeguard Religious Freedom and Reform ICE

The Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty calls on Congress to hold ICE accountable for practices that infringe upon religious freedom and human dignity. They advocate for the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act to shield places of worship from immigration enforcement and encourage citizens to contact their representatives for immediate action.

PG County Settles Lawsuit After Muslim Chaplain Discrimination Claims

Prince George's County has settled a lawsuit with Imam Edrees Bridges, who alleged religious discrimination when a jail chaplain position was only open to Christians. The settlement includes a $195,000 payment and reinstatement of Bridges as a volunteer chaplain, marking a significant victory for religious freedom.

Clergy Arrested, Businesses Closed in Minnesota Protests Against ICE Surge

Minnesota has witnessed widespread protests against a surge of federal immigration agents, resulting in clergy arrests and numerous business closures. The protests, part of a coordinated national action, were sparked by the shooting of Renee Good and aimed to challenge the Trump administration's immigration policies.