Orthodox Jewish Professor Files Discrimination Lawsuit Against NJ University

Mar 11, 2026, 2:24 AM
Image for article Orthodox Jewish Professor Files Discrimination Lawsuit Against NJ University

Hover over text to view sources

Dr Tal Ben-Zvi, a professor of information systems and technology at Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, New Jersey, has filed a significant lawsuit against the university, alleging widespread discrimination based on his Orthodox Jewish faith and physical disability. The lawsuit details a series of alleged incidents involving harassment, public humiliation, and retaliation following his complaints about what he describes as anti-Jewish hostility within the institution.
In his lawsuit, Dr Ben-Zvi claims he faced ridicule and punitive treatment when seeking basic accommodations, such as time off for Jewish holidays and access to kosher meals at university events. He alleges that after he filed complaints regarding these issues, his treatment by university administration deteriorated significantly, particularly from Gregory Prastacos, the dean of the School of Business.
One notable incident involved Dr Ben-Zvi being required to attend a meeting during Passover, a major Jewish holiday, and being invited to events on Yom Kippur, despite his explicit objections. He also reported a lack of kosher food at a professional meeting, where other dietary needs were accommodated, which he claims was met with indifference by the administration.
Dr Ben-Zvi, who has a permanent leg disability that occasionally requires him to use a cane, alleges that Stevens failed to protect his medical privacy. He claims a faculty member publicly disclosed his health information without consent, an issue that he says was ignored by the administration.
The lawsuit also touches on gender bias, as Dr Ben-Zvi alleges that his vote against granting tenure to a colleague was mischaracterized as gender discrimination stemming from his religious beliefs. He contends this was a tactic to divert attention from his own complaints about religious discrimination.
The broader implications of his lawsuit highlight a troubling pattern of disregard for Jewish individuals on the Stevens campus. Affidavits from both faculty and students suggest a culture that may not only be indifferent to antisemitism but could actively foster it. Professor Deborah Sinnreich-Levi provided testimony indicating that one faculty member suggested scheduling meetings on Jewish holidays to "weed out the Jews," a remark that was reportedly ignored by the administration.
Students have echoed these sentiments, with Dennis Vink, president of the campus Hillel chapter, stating that Jewish students frequently face dilemmas between holiday observance and academic obligations. Following the recent Hamas attack on Israel, many Jewish students reported feeling unsafe on campus, yet university leadership, including President Nariman Farvardin, allegedly refused to meet with them to discuss their concerns.
The lawsuit encompasses claims of religious and disability discrimination, failure to provide reasonable accommodations, retaliation, wage violations, and document destruction. Dr Ben-Zvi asserts that his situation worsened after he filed a complaint with the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regarding antisemitism, resulting in denied promotions and withheld salary.
He is seeking compensation for the damages he has incurred, both financially and emotionally, along with a court ruling that acknowledges what he describes as a pervasive "culture of silence, discrimination and immorality-masked as progress" at Stevens Institute of Technology.
In response to these allegations, a spokesperson for Stevens stated that Dr Ben-Zvi's complaints have been thoroughly investigated over the years and found to lack evidence of discrimination. The university emphasizes its commitment to maintaining an inclusive and diverse community, asserting that it has clear policies in place for accommodating religious observances.
This case raises important questions about the treatment of religious minorities in academic settings and the responsibilities of institutions to foster an environment free from discrimination. As the lawsuit progresses, it may shed light on the broader issues of religious accommodation in workplaces and educational institutions across the country.

Related articles

Holy War? Trump Era Blurs Religion and Military Lines

Under President Trump's administration, the intertwining of religious ideology and military action has become increasingly evident. Prominent figures within the military have adopted evangelical Christian narratives, framing conflicts such as the war with Iran as divinely sanctioned, raising concerns about the implications for US foreign policy and military ethics.

Church Leaders Urge Christians to Rise Against Trump Administration

A coalition of nearly 400 Christian leaders has issued a powerful statement condemning the Trump administration as 'cruel and oppressive.' They call for Christians to engage in acts of courage to resist policies that threaten democracy and human rights, particularly regarding immigration and racial equity.

Church Leaders Urge Protest Against Trump Administration's Policies

A coalition of nearly 400 Christian leaders has issued a powerful statement condemning the Trump administration as 'cruel and oppressive.' They are calling on Christians to protest the government's actions, particularly regarding immigration and civil rights, which they argue threaten democracy and moral values.

Lawmakers Call for Investigation into DOD's Religious Rhetoric

More than two dozen Democratic lawmakers have formally requested an investigation into the Department of Defense following claims that military leaders are framing the conflict in Iran as a biblical prophecy. The allegations suggest that some commanders are linking military actions to Christian beliefs, raising significant constitutional and ethical concerns.

Trump Open to Religious Leadership in Iran Amid Ongoing Conflict

President Donald Trump expressed that he is 'fine' with another religious figure leading Iran, asserting that democratic governance is not a necessity for the nation. His remarks come amidst heightened tensions following the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, which has escalated military operations in the region.