Michael Regan Criticizes EPA's Deregulation Under Trump

Mar 16, 2026, 2:17 AM
Image for article Michael Regan Criticizes EPA's Deregulation Under Trump

Hover over text to view sources

Michael Regan, the former administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under President Joe Biden, has expressed alarm over the rollback of crucial environmental protections enacted during his tenure. Following the appointment of Lee Zeldin, a Trump appointee, to lead the EPA, the agency has significantly altered its stance on climate regulations, raising concerns among environmental advocates and public health officials alike.
During an interview at North Carolina A&T University, Regan highlighted the dangers posed by the EPA's recent decisions, including the revocation of the Obama-era finding that greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, threaten public health. This finding had served as a legal foundation for numerous climate regulations. Regan noted, "Not only are we removing ourselves from a competitive position to develop technologies to compete with the rest of the world, we are endangering our people at home from a public health standpoint, and we are exacerbating the climate crisis." These comments underline the potential consequences of the ongoing deregulation efforts, which critics argue could reverse years of progress in tackling climate change.
The Trump administration's recent actions include eliminating emissions standards for cars and trucks, a decision that Regan finds particularly troubling given its implications for both air quality and climate change. The rollback is expected to lead to increased emissions, which are linked to various health issues, including respiratory illnesses and cardiovascular diseases. The Trump administration argues that these changes will enhance consumer choice and restore "common sense" to policy, but Regan and others caution that the long-term effects could be detrimental to public health and the environment.
Legal challenges to these deregulations are already underway, with Regan expressing optimism that the courts will recognize the importance of following established laws and scientific evidence. He stated, "I'm optimistic that the courts will see that we followed the law, followed the science and that this will be a pause." This sentiment reflects a broader hope among environmental advocates that judicial oversight will mitigate the impact of the new regulations.
Under Regan's leadership, the EPA had made significant strides in addressing environmental justice and promoting clean energy technologies, including the introduction of national drinking water standards for PFAS—substances often found in contaminated water supplies. However, the current direction under Zeldin has raised fears that these advancements could be undone, with potential implications for both public health and the economy.
The implications of these regulatory shifts extend beyond public health; they are also tied to the US's position in the global marketplace for clean technologies. Regan pointed out that by retreating from aggressive climate policy, the US risks falling behind other nations that are investing heavily in green technologies. This could have long-term consequences for American workers and industries that are poised to benefit from the clean energy transition.
In conclusion, the recent changes at the EPA under the Trump administration have sparked significant concern among environmentalists, public health advocates, and former officials like Michael Regan. As the agency moves away from previously established standards, the potential for exacerbating the climate crisis and compromising public health remains a pressing issue. The outcome of ongoing legal challenges and public discourse will be crucial in determining the future of US environmental policy and its effectiveness in combating climate change.

Related articles

Aimee McCarron Champions Community Solar in New Orleans

Councilmember Aimee McCarron has successfully advanced community solar requirements aimed at increasing access to clean energy in New Orleans. As chair of the Climate Change and Sustainability Committee, her initiative is expected to significantly lower electricity costs for residents and promote sustainability.

The U.S. Retreat from CO2 Emission Regulations: A Step Back for Climate Action

The Trump administration's recent proposal to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding has sparked significant debate over the future of greenhouse gas regulations in the US This move is seen as a rollback of vital climate actions aimed at mitigating CO2 emissions, amidst growing concerns about climate change impacts.

U.S. Solar Installations Decline Amid Trump's Clean Energy Attacks

In 2025, US solar power installations fell by 14% compared to the previous year, largely due to the Trump administration's renewed focus on fossil fuels and criticism of renewable energy. Despite being the largest source of new electricity generation, the solar industry faces significant challenges from policy changes, impacting both growth and job creation.

U.S. Emission Regulations: A Shift Away from Climate Action

The US has recently seen a significant rollback in regulations aimed at controlling greenhouse gas emissions, primarily driven by the Trump administration's proposal to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding. This decision, rooted in legal interpretations, raises concerns about the implications for climate change policies and future emissions standards.

Florida Senate Passes Bill to Ban Local Net-Zero Initiatives

The Florida Senate has approved a bill banning local governments from implementing net-zero policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The legislation, which passed with a 24-12 vote, has sparked significant debate over its implications for local climate initiatives and the state's approach to environmental policy.