Lawsuit Filed Over Removal of Climate Change Signs at Acadia National Park

Feb 23, 2026, 2:52 AM
Image for article Lawsuit Filed Over Removal of Climate Change Signs at Acadia National Park

Hover over text to view sources

A coalition of conservation groups has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging the removal of climate change signage at Acadia National Park in Maine. This legal action is part of a broader effort to stop the erasure of historical and science-based materials from national parks across the United States.
The lawsuit highlights the removal of signs that inform visitors about the impacts of climate change and the heritage of the Wabanaki people. Kristin Brengel, senior vice president of government affairs for the National Parks Conservation Association, emphasized that visitors are eager to learn about local history and environmental changes, rather than just receiving simplified narratives.
The controversy stems from an executive order signed by President Trump, which mandates the removal of park materials deemed "disparaging" to American greatness. Brengel argues that this directive contradicts long-standing National Park Service laws, which require educational materials to be peer-reviewed and meet high scientific standards. She expressed concern that this move is not aligned with the interests of the public, stating, "No one is clamoring for this and no one is asking for it.".
In addition to the Acadia National Park signage, the lawsuit also addresses the removal of a slavery exhibit in Philadelphia, underscoring a pattern of eliminating educational resources that reflect uncomfortable truths about American history. Brengel noted that the data collected through QR codes from visitors indicated strong support for factual interpretations of both science and history, despite the administration's actions.
The removal of these educational materials has sparked significant public dissent. Polls indicate that a bipartisan majority of Americans disapprove of the administration's approach to historical interpretation in national parks.
Brengel further argued that the public deserves access to accurate information about the natural and cultural heritage of national parks. "We really just want to make sure the facts are the facts, the science is the science, and that people get a true picture of the places that we've protected," she said. This sentiment is echoed by many who value the educational aspect of visiting national parks, which saw over 330 million visits in 2024 alone.
The lawsuit represents a critical moment in the ongoing debate over how historical narratives are presented in national parks. As the administration continues to face scrutiny over its policies, advocates for environmental and historical education hope this legal challenge will reverse the trend of removing significant educational materials from public view.
As this case unfolds, it remains to be seen how the courts will respond to the arguments raised by conservation groups and whether they will impact the future of educational resources in national parks across the United States.
The outcome of the lawsuit may have broader implications for how climate change and historical narratives are communicated in the nation's public spaces, potentially shaping the educational landscape for future generations.
In summary, the fight to preserve climate change signage at Acadia National Park reflects a larger struggle for accurate representation of history and science in America’s national parks, emphasizing the need for ongoing public discourse about environmental issues and historical truths.

Related articles

Wildlife Advocates Prepare Lawsuit Over Clear Lake Hitch Protections

Wildlife advocates are threatening to sue the Trump administration for failing to provide federal protections for the Clear Lake hitch, a threatened fish species native to Northern California. The Center for Biological Diversity claims the US Fish and Wildlife Service has ignored scientific evidence pointing to the fish's imminent extinction due to habitat loss and climate change.

Lawmakers Press Insurers on Payout Requirements for Wildfire Victims

California lawmakers are demanding explanations from insurance companies regarding stringent requirements for wildfire damage payouts. Amidst a growing insurance crisis exacerbated by recent fires, legislators are proposing new bills to enhance oversight and ensure timely compensation for affected homeowners.

Trump Administration Removes Climate Change, Native American Info from National Parks

The Trump Administration has ordered the removal of educational materials related to climate change and Native American history from numerous national parks. This initiative, part of an executive order aimed at 'restoring truth and sanity to American history', has drawn significant criticism from environmental and historical organizations.

Climate Change and Native American History Erased from National Parks

Recent directives from the Trump administration have led to the removal of significant signage related to climate change and Native American history from national parks. Critics argue that this represents a troubling attempt to whitewash US history and ignore pressing environmental issues.

New Legislation Signals Shift in Wildfire Management Strategies

Recent legislation introduced by US Senators aims to reshape wildfire management policies by prioritizing home hardening over logging. This marks a significant shift in funding and strategy, seeking to protect communities from the increasing threat of wildfires.