California Sues Trump Over $1.2 Billion Energy Program Cuts

Feb 20, 2026, 2:20 AM

Hover over text to view sources

In a significant legal challenge, California has taken action against former President Donald Trump, alleging that his administration unlawfully terminated $1.2 billion in funding for critical energy and infrastructure programs. This lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, is spearheaded by Attorney General Rob Bonta and supported by a coalition of 13 attorneys general from various states.

The funding in question was allocated for initiatives established under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The lawsuit claims that the cuts, particularly to the Alliance for Renewable Clean Hydrogen Energy Systems (ARCHES) and the Resilient and Efficient Codes Implementation (RECI) program, violate the constitutional separation of powers, as these funds were approved by bipartisan majorities in Congress.

Attorney General Bonta emphasized the negative impact of these terminations, stating that the loss of funding could lead to over 200,000 job cuts, higher energy prices, and increased pollution, severely affecting public health. He criticized the Trump administration for what he called "cherry-picking" funding, which he argues stifles economic innovation and progress for the sake of political retribution.

Governor Gavin Newsom also expressed strong opposition to the funding cuts, stating, "Trump didn't just tear up a contract: he defied Congress, jeopardized more than 200,000 good-paying jobs, and robbed billions of dollars in health savings from communities that have been hit hardest by pollution." He affirmed California's commitment to fighting for the jobs and infrastructure that are essential for the state's energy future.

The ARCHES project, which aimed to establish a clean hydrogen hub in California, was expected to significantly reduce fossil fuel use in public transportation and heavy-duty trucking, with the potential to eliminate approximately 2 million metric tons of carbon emissions annually. This aligns with California's broader goals of achieving a carbon-neutral economy and expanding its clean energy capabilities.

Under the Trump administration, the Department of Energy (DOE) had implemented a "review" process that many critics argue was merely a guise to eliminate funding for renewable energy projects that were previously established by Congress. The lawsuit asserts that the administration's actions are part of a broader pattern of illegal conduct that undermines both environmental and economic progress.

In light of these funding cuts, California's Attorney General and other state leaders are calling for immediate action from the court to restore the funding and uphold the integrity of the legislative process. The coalition of attorneys general aims to ensure that the federal government adheres to its obligations under the law, which mandates the faithful execution of programs created by Congress.

With California's ambitious climate goals and significant investments in clean energy, the outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching implications not only for the state's economy but also for the national landscape of renewable energy initiatives. As the legal battle unfolds, California remains determined to hold the Trump administration accountable for what it deems unlawful and detrimental actions against the state's clean energy future.

This lawsuit is part of a growing trend of states challenging federal decisions that they believe jeopardize environmental standards and economic opportunities, reflecting a broader conflict between state and federal authorities over energy policy. As the case progresses, it will be closely watched by both political and environmental advocates across the nation.

Vermont and New York Join Lawsuit Against Trump Administration's Energy Cuts

Vermont and New York have joined a coalition of states suing the Trump administration over significant cuts to federal funding for energy and infrastructure projects. The lawsuit claims these cuts violate federal law and are politically motivated, impacting vital clean energy initiatives across Democratic-controlled states.

California Sues Trump Over $1.2 Billion Energy Funding Cuts

California has filed a lawsuit against former President Donald Trump for unlawfully terminating $1.2 billion in federal funding for clean energy projects. The lawsuit, which alleges violations of constitutional separation of powers, aims to protect jobs and advance the state's clean energy goals.

Trump's Venezuela Oil Deal Raises Recognition Dilemma for U.S. Government

The Trump administration's recent arrangement to manage Venezuelan oil revenues has sparked significant debate regarding US recognition of Venezuela's government. With the capture of Nicolás Maduro and the US dealings with Vice President Delcy Rodríguez, questions arise about the legitimacy of leadership and the future governance of Venezuela.

Dark Money Surge Alters Alabama's Energy Policy Landscape

A recent investigation reveals a significant influx of dark money, primarily from left-leaning sources, into Alabama's energy policy debates. Groups like Energy Alabama are at the center of this campaign, receiving funds from organizations linked to controversial figures and ideologies, raising concerns about transparency and the influence of external interests on local energy regulations.

Trump's Oil Sanction Strategy Targets Cuba Amid Venezuela Unrest

The Trump administration's aggressive approach towards Venezuela includes cutting oil supplies to Cuba, aiming to destabilize both regimes. This strategy underscores the geopolitical interests of the US in the region as it seeks to leverage its energy policies to influence political change.