US Lawmakers Demand UK Briefing on Apple's Encryption Backdoor Order

Feb 26, 2026, 2:36 AM
Image for article US Lawmakers Demand UK Briefing on Apple's Encryption Backdoor Order

Hover over text to view sources

US House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan and Foreign Affairs Chair Brian Mast have formally requested a briefing from the British government concerning its order for Apple to develop a backdoor to its encrypted user data. This request aims to clarify the implications of the UK government's actions, which have raised significant concerns among US lawmakers about user privacy and cybersecurity risks.
The lawmakers expressed their worries that an encryption backdoor could potentially be exploited by cybercriminals and authoritarian governments. In their joint letter to British Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, they emphasized the necessity for public awareness and understanding regarding the Technical Capability Notice (TCN) issued to Apple.
They stated, "For there to be a 'mature and informed public debate,' it is imperative that the Committees fully understand the actions taken by the UK government" regarding the TCN. The letter requested that the briefing be arranged as soon as possible, with a deadline set for March 11, 2026.
The UK's attempts to gain access to iCloud users' private data have been ongoing and contentious. Apple has consistently maintained a strong stance on user privacy, previously challenging similar orders from both the UK and the US The company has refused to create any backdoor access into its encrypted services, a position it has upheld in various legal battles.
The issue began to escalate after a revised version of the Investigatory Powers Act was passed in January 2025, prompting the UK to demand an encryption backdoor from Apple. This demand sparked bipartisan criticism within the US Congress, leading to lawmakers reaching out to US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard for clarity on the matter. Gabbard expressed her concern regarding the lack of communication about the UK's secret order, highlighting that the US was not informed of these developments.
Despite the UK's initial demands, it appears the government has since backed down from its request for direct access to encrypted Messages as of August 2025, according to Gabbard's social media statements. However, the UK still seeks access to the iCloud data of its citizens, as indicated by a Home Office order in September 2025 that required Apple to facilitate access to encrypted cloud backups.
The ongoing tension between user privacy advocacy and government surveillance demands continues to attract attention from US lawmakers. The recent request for a briefing underscores the complexities surrounding encryption and the implications for both user safety and national security.
As the situation develops, the response from the UK government regarding the lawmakers' request remains to be seen. The clarifications sought by US officials indicate a growing concern over international cooperation on cybersecurity and the balance between privacy rights and law enforcement needs.
The dialogue surrounding encryption backdoors is likely to persist as both governments navigate the challenges posed by technological advancements and the needs for security and privacy in the digital age.

Related articles

Trump's AI Regulation Strategy: State Politics and Legal Battles Ahead

The Trump administration's push to limit state-level AI regulations through executive orders is facing significant political and legal challenges. While some states advance their own AI laws, the federal government threatens lawsuits and funding cuts against those deemed overly restrictive, raising questions about the balance of power in AI governance.

State Politics Shape Trump's AI Regulation Strategy

The Trump administration's efforts to challenge state-level AI regulations through executive orders are facing significant political hurdles. Diverse state responses, particularly in Democrat-led regions, complicate the administration's push for a unified federal framework, raising questions about the legality and effectiveness of these actions.

OpenAI and Anthropic Clash Over AI Policy in Political Arena

OpenAI and Anthropic are increasingly engaging in the political landscape, with significant donations to Super PACs to influence AI regulation. Anthropic's recent $20 million contribution aims to counter OpenAI's lobbying efforts, creating a complex political battleground over the future of AI policy in the United States.

AI in Texas Campaign Ads: Ethical Concerns and Regulatory Debates

The increasing use of artificial intelligence in Texas political campaign ads has ignited a heated debate over ethics and transparency. Candidates and strategists are divided on the need for disclosure and potential regulations, raising questions about the implications of AI technology in shaping voter perceptions.

Overwatch AI Legislation Gains Traction in U.S. Senate

The US Senate is advancing legislation to enhance oversight and regulation of artificial intelligence, including the DEFIANCE Act aimed at preventing AI-enabled exploitation. As bipartisan efforts grow, the focus on AI's societal impacts intensifies amid concerns over safety and ethical standards.