Trump's EPA Claims Climate Change Isn't a Public Health Risk

Feb 22, 2026, 2:17 AM

Hover over text to view sources

On February 12, 2026, the Trump administration officially moved to rescind the 2009 endangerment finding, which declared that six greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide and methane, pose a significant threat to public health and welfare. This decision is part of broader efforts to dismantle existing climate policies, raising alarms among health professionals and environmental scientists who argue that the administration is ignoring critical evidence linking climate change to serious health risks.

Climate change is increasingly recognized as a significant determinant of health, with effects ranging from rising temperatures to extreme weather events. The administration's dismissal of these risks has been met with strong opposition, particularly from experts who highlight the growing body of research demonstrating the health impacts associated with climate phenomena.

Health Risks from Climate Change

The ramifications of climate change are extensive. Extreme heat, intensified by greenhouse gas emissions, poses a direct threat to vulnerable populations, including the elderly and those with pre-existing health conditions. With heat-related deaths rising globally—up by 23% from the 1990s to the 2010s—the urgency to address this issue has never been clearer. Notably, the 2021 Pacific Northwest heat dome resulted in hundreds of fatalities, underscoring the lethal potential of extreme heat events.

Moreover, climate change exacerbates extreme weather events, leading to increased rainfall, more intense storms, and flooding. These conditions not only lead to injuries and drownings but also create environments conducive to water contamination, which can harbor pathogens. The cleanup efforts post-flooding are fraught with additional health risks, including mold exposure and mental distress.

Air Quality and Pollution

Air quality has deteriorated due to climate change, particularly through the prevalence of wildfires, which release toxic particulate matter into the atmosphere. This smoke can travel long distances, impacting respiratory health and increasing the risk of heart disease. Additionally, the formation of ground-level ozone is heightened by warmer temperatures, further aggravating air quality issues that lead to asthma and other respiratory illnesses.

The interrelation between climate change and infectious diseases is also emerging as a significant concern. Rising temperatures have been linked to increased mosquito populations and the spread of diseases such as dengue fever and chikungunya in various US states, including Florida and Texas. Increases in heavy rainfall also heighten the risks of foodborne illnesses and other waterborne diseases.

The Broader Implications of Rescinding the Finding

The Trump administration's decision to revoke the endangerment finding is seen as part of a larger trend that favors fossil fuel industries and undermines renewable energy initiatives. Critics argue that this approach not only ignores established scientific evidence but also jeopardizes public health by rolling back essential regulations designed to mitigate climate-related health risks.

Experts emphasize that addressing climate change not only protects the environment but also promotes public health. Strategies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions can lead to cleaner air and lower incidence of heart and lung diseases. Additionally, creating infrastructures that promote walking and cycling can enhance community health by encouraging physical activity.

Conclusion

The debate over climate change and public health is far from settled, but the evidence is compelling. The Trump administration's stance appears increasingly at odds with a growing consensus among scientists and health professionals regarding the dangers posed by climate change. As the nation grapples with these critical issues, it is essential to reaffirm the importance of sound environmental policies that recognize the intricate links between climate change and health outcomes.

In light of the overwhelming evidence, advocates argue for a renewed commitment to transitioning from fossil fuels to a sustainable energy future to safeguard both public health and the environment.

Trump Dismisses Climate Change as a 'Scam', Science Contradicts

President Trump's recent remarks dismissing climate change as a 'scam' have sparked significant controversy. Scientific evidence, however, indicates that climate change poses serious threats to public health, with increasing heat-related deaths and other health risks being documented across the globe.

Trump's Policies Risk Escalating Car Pollution and Health Hazards

Former President Trump's recent policy decisions threaten to increase car pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, posing significant health risks. Experts warn that these changes could exacerbate climate-related health issues, including respiratory diseases and heat-related illnesses, potentially endangering millions of Americans.

EPA Rollback Threatens Air Quality and Health in Maine

Recent changes by the EPA to revoke federal climate protections are raising concerns about worsening air quality in Maine, a state already facing high asthma rates. Experts warn that the rollback could lead to increased pollution from upwind industrial sources, exacerbating health risks for vulnerable populations.

Trump's Rollback on Climate Policies Raises Health Risks

The Trump administration's efforts to rescind climate regulations are raising concerns about public health and environmental safety. Experts warn that increased air pollution from vehicles and industrial sources could lead to higher rates of heat-related illnesses, respiratory conditions, and cancer, as well as exacerbate existing health disparities in vulnerable communities.

U.S. Government Reverses Stance on Climate Change and Public Health

The US government has officially stated that climate change does not pose a threat to public health, reversing a longstanding position. This decision, part of a broader deregulatory agenda, has drawn criticism from health experts and environmental advocates, who warn of the potential harms to vulnerable communities.