Trump Administration Revokes EPA's Climate Change Authority

Feb 19, 2026, 2:42 AM
Image for article Trump Administration Revokes EPA's Climate Change Authority

Hover over text to view sources

The Trump administration has taken a historic step by revoking the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) endangerment finding, which served as a crucial legal foundation for regulating greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. This move is described as the "single largest deregulatory action in American history" by President Trump, who claimed it would eliminate over $1.3 trillion in regulatory costs.
The endangerment finding, established in 2009, classified carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases as pollutants that endanger public health and welfare. It originated from a 2007 Supreme Court decision, which mandated that the EPA must regulate these emissions under the Clean Air Act. By revoking this finding, the Trump administration aims to roll back regulations that have been pivotal in combating climate change, particularly those affecting the automotive and power generation sectors.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin emphasized that this action would lower costs for consumers, particularly in the auto industry, stating, "You can get a better car... for a lot less money." He suggested that the rollback would allow manufacturers to produce vehicles that better meet consumer needs without excessive regulatory burdens. However, critics argue that such measures prioritize short-term economic benefits over long-term environmental sustainability.
Environmental advocates have already pledged to challenge the repeal in court. Marvin Brown, a senior attorney at Earthjustice, condemned the move as "an affront to our public health" and promised legal action to protect regulations vital for addressing climate change. Robert Howarth, a professor at Cornell University, underscored that the decision is "not based on science" and reflects a predetermined political agenda rather than an evidence-based approach.
The implications of this decision extend beyond the immediate revocation of the endangerment finding. Experts warn that it could lead to a broader dismantling of climate regulations across various sectors, including power plants and oil and gas facilities. David Doniger from the Natural Resources Defense Council stated that this repeal could invalidate current pollution limits and hinder future regulatory efforts to combat global warming.
The announcement has sparked considerable backlash from environmental groups and former officials. Gina McCarthy, a former EPA administrator, characterized the action as reckless, asserting that the agency is prioritizing the interests of the fossil fuel industry over public health and environmental protection. The Sierra Club has also indicated intentions to legally challenge the repeal, emphasizing the importance of scientific integrity in environmental policy.
The Trump administration's deregulatory agenda, which includes the closure of the EPA's Office of Research and Development, further complicates the agency's capacity to address environmental challenges effectively. Critics argue that dismantling this scientific research arm will severely limit the EPA's ability to utilize and apply critical research regarding climate change and environmental hazards.
As the legal battles begin, the future of climate regulation in the US hangs in the balance. The decision to revoke the endangerment finding has been met with widespread condemnation from scientists, environmentalists, and health advocates, all of whom stress the necessity of robust action against climate change to safeguard public health and the environment.
In summary, the Trump administration's recent actions represent a significant shift in US environmental policy, focusing on deregulation while raising concerns about the long-term impacts on climate change and public health. As lawsuits are anticipated, the response from the environmental community will be a critical factor in shaping the future of climate regulation in the country.

Related articles

EPA Repeals Climate Change Finding, Affects Emission Regulations

The EPA has rescinded its long-standing endangerment finding, a critical determination that enabled the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions in the US This significant move, described as the largest deregulatory action in American history, has drawn sharp criticism from environmental groups and may lead to extensive legal challenges.

Oregon and Washington Sue Trump Over Clean Energy Funding Cuts

Oregon and Washington have joined a multistate lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging cuts to the Solar For All program. The program aimed to provide low-income households with access to solar energy solutions, but its funding was recently terminated, prompting legal action from several states.

Reactions to Trump's Deregulation of Climate Change Efforts

Reactions to the Trump administration's decision to end the federal government's authority to combat climate change have been polarized. Critics argue it undermines scientific consensus and public health, while supporters hail it as a move towards deregulation and economic growth.

Trump Administration Undermines Climate Change Regulations

The Trump administration has revoked the scientific endangerment finding for greenhouse gases, a key legal basis for regulating emissions. This significant deregulation move is expected to increase pollution substantially and has drawn immediate legal challenges from environmental groups and state leaders.

EPA's Reversal of Landmark Climate Ruling Fuels Trump Era Deregulation

The Environmental Protection Agency has rescinded its 2009 endangerment finding, a key climate regulation that deemed greenhouse gases a threat to public health. This move is seen as a significant step towards deregulating environmental protections established during previous administrations, potentially paving the way for more aggressive actions against climate regulations under the Trump administration.