Supreme Court Upholds New York's Even-Year Election Law

Mar 24, 2026, 2:23 AM
Image for article Supreme Court Upholds New York's Even-Year Election Law

Hover over text to view sources

The US Supreme Court has chosen not to review a challenge to New York's recently enacted law that shifts most local elections to even-numbered years. This decision was confirmed in an order issued on Monday, which allows the state law to remain in effect and will enable a related federal lawsuit to proceed.
Passed by the New York state Legislature and signed into law by Governor Kathy Hochul in December 2023, the law aims to align local elections with state and federal races, thereby increasing voter engagement. It is designed to coincide local town and county elections outside of New York City with presidential and gubernatorial elections, which historically see higher voter turnout.
Proponents of the law argue that moving local elections to even-numbered years will enhance voter participation, citing research that indicates an increase of at least 18% in voter turnout during presidential election years. They contend that streamlining election schedules will also reduce administrative costs for local governments.
However, the law has faced opposition from various quarters, including Republican officials and some local governments. Critics assert that the law undermines local governance by forcing county elections to compete for attention with larger state and federal issues. They argue that this change could dilute the focus on local matters, which are often overshadowed during elections that include high-profile races.
Opponents have also raised concerns regarding the law’s constitutionality, claiming it treats different local governments unequally, thereby violating constitutional principles. Furthermore, they argue that it conflicts with the charters of 20 counties in New York, which have locally established laws governing their authority and operations.
The Supreme Court's decision not to intervene means that the New York Court of Appeals' ruling from October 2025, which upheld the law's constitutionality, stands. This ruling was significant as it overturned an earlier decision by a lower court that had nullified the law.
With the Supreme Court's dismissal of the case, a separate federal lawsuit challenging the same law will continue in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York. This case was initiated by the New York Republican State Committee and several Republican-led towns, arguing that the law violates various constitutional rights.
The even-year election law is expected to take effect beginning with the 2025 election cycle, marking a fundamental shift in New York's electoral calendar. While supporters hail the change as a necessary step for enhancing democracy, the ongoing legal challenges and public debate reflect the contentious nature of electoral law reforms in the US.
As this situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how the law will impact local elections and whether it will indeed lead to the increased voter engagement its supporters anticipate. The legal landscape surrounding electoral laws continues to evolve, highlighting the complexities and varying perspectives on governance at the local level across the nation.

Related articles

Senate Confirms Markwayne Mullin as Homeland Security Secretary

The US Senate has confirmed Senator Markwayne Mullin as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security with a 54-45 vote. Mullin, a staunch Trump loyalist, is set to lead the department amid ongoing immigration challenges and aims to restore its credibility following recent controversies.

Graham Platner Fights Back Against Janet Mills' Attacks

Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner stands firm amid scrutiny over his past online comments and a controversial tattoo. Despite attacks from rival Janet Mills, Platner emphasizes his commitment to progressive values and community engagement.

Trump Installs Controversial Columbus Statue on White House Grounds

President Donald Trump has officially installed a statue of Christopher Columbus outside the White House, a move intended to honor the controversial explorer. The statue, which was previously destroyed during protests in Baltimore, has sparked renewed debate over Columbus's legacy and the ongoing discourse surrounding historical monuments.

Opinion: Courts Can't Rescue Democracy from Trump's Autocracy

As lawsuits mount against the Trump-Musk administration, reliance on the courts to save democracy is misguided. The judiciary is ill-equipped to act swiftly against a president willing to defy rulings, leaving citizens to consider more robust political actions.

Supreme Court to Rule on Mississippi Mail-In Ballot Law

The US Supreme Court is set to determine whether Mississippi's law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted after Election Day violates federal law. The case, which could affect voting rights nationwide, has drawn significant attention as it may impact the rules governing mail-in voting leading up to the 2026 midterm elections.