Oregon Senator Revives Climate Superfund Bill Targeting Big Oil

Feb 7, 2026, 2:50 AM
Image for article Oregon Senator Revives Climate Superfund Bill Targeting Big Oil

Hover over text to view sources

Oregon State Senator Jeff Golden has brought back the Climate Superfund Bill, a proposal that could hold some of the largest oil and gas companies accountable for climate change-related disasters. This initiative comes less than a year after a previous version of the bill failed to pass in the Oregon Legislature.
Senate Bill 1541 is modeled after similar legislation in New York and Vermont and aims to establish a disaster fund within the Oregon Treasury. This fund would be financed by damages paid by companies responsible for significant greenhouse gas emissions, including major players like Exxon Mobil and Chevron. These companies account for approximately 80% of global emissions over the past decade.
Golden reintroduced the bill during a public hearing in the Senate Natural Resources and Wildfire Committee. During the previous legislative session, the bill did not advance due to time constraints, according to committee chair Senator Janeen Sollman.
The recent hearing saw a turnout of around 60 attendees, with over 70 individuals signing up to provide testimony, reflecting strong community interest and support for the bill. Advocates included local government officials, religious leaders, and first responders, all of whom shared personal accounts of how extreme weather events have impacted their communities. Talent Mayor Darby Ayers-Flood recounted the devastation her town faced during the Almeda Fire in 2020, which destroyed a third of Talent and left lasting trauma in the community.
The bill's supporters emphasize the need for accountability. Pastor Brennan Guillory highlighted the disparity between those profiting from climate change and the communities suffering its effects, stating, "It is time for those who have benefitted the most to start paying to fix this disaster.".
However, the proposal has faced opposition from representatives of the natural resource and business industries. Sharla Moffett, a lobbyist for Oregon Business and Industry, expressed concern that the bill could harm Oregon's economic competitiveness, potentially leading to increased fuel prices.
The Climate Superfund Bill would operate similarly to the 1980 federal law that established "superfund sites," which are designated for cleanup due to hazardous contamination. Under this legislation, Oregon's Department of Land Conservation and Development would evaluate state expenditures on climate-related disasters from 1995 to 2024. The Department of Environmental Quality would identify the companies responsible for emissions and issue recovery notices for damages.
The proposed fund would allocate 30% of its resources to the Oregon State Fire Marshal's Office for wildfire prevention and response, while 40% would go towards resilience projects for disadvantaged communities disproportionately affected by climate change.
If the bill passes, it is anticipated that it will face legal challenges similar to those encountered in New York and Vermont, where similar laws have been contested. Critics, including the Trump administration and the American Petroleum Institute, argue that such laws infringe on due process rights by imposing retroactive penalties.
Despite potential legal hurdles, experts like Vermont attorney Geoff Hand assert the legality of the superfund approach, noting that states possess the authority to safeguard public health and welfare.
As Oregon navigates the complexities of climate change and its impacts, the revival of the Climate Superfund Bill represents a significant effort to hold major corporations accountable and to invest in community resilience and recovery initiatives.

Related articles

Trump's Arctic Drilling Plans: A Threat to Global Climate Stability

The Trump administration's push to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil and gas drilling raises significant concerns about its implications for global climate change. Environmentalists warn that this could exacerbate climate impacts and threaten both wildlife and Indigenous communities in the region.

Hawaii Leverages Trump Court Loss to Bolster Climate Lawsuit

Hawaii is using a recent Supreme Court ruling against former President Trump's administration to strengthen its case in a climate lawsuit aimed at major oil companies. The court's decisions have raised questions about the power of federal agencies, which Hawaii argues should not shield companies from accountability for their role in climate change.

Legal Demand for Pennsylvania to Cut Carbon Emissions

Attorneys have issued a legal demand to the state of Pennsylvania, urging it to implement measures aimed at drastically reducing carbon emissions across various sectors of its economy. This demand highlights the growing urgency for states to take independent action in light of federal climate policy shifts.

Trump's Exit from Climate Treaties: Global Impact Minimal Outside US

President Trump's decision to withdraw the US from key international climate treaties is seen as a significant shift in global climate policy. However, experts argue that this move will have limited effects on global climate action, as other nations continue to push for low-carbon transitions.

Trump's Policies May Boost Renewable Energy Projects

Despite concerns about potential funding freezes and regulatory rollbacks, experts suggest that Trump's energy policies could provide unexpected support for renewable energy projects. His administration's focus on cutting red tape and increasing energy production may inadvertently benefit the sector.