Oregon Lawmakers Revive Climate Superfund Bill to Charge Polluters

Feb 13, 2026, 2:36 AM
Image for article Oregon Lawmakers Revive Climate Superfund Bill to Charge Polluters

Hover over text to view sources

Oregon lawmakers are making a renewed effort to pass Senate Bill 1541, which would require major fossil fuel companies to pay for damages and economic losses incurred by Oregonians due to extreme weather events. This initiative is part of a broader movement across several states to hold polluters accountable for their contributions to climate change and its impacts on public health and safety.
The proposed legislation, commonly referred to as a "Climate Superfund," aims to create a fund that would cover the costs associated with responding to disasters such as wildfires, droughts, and heatwaves. This approach mirrors the federal Superfund program from the 1980s, which mandated that polluters finance the cleanup of hazardous waste sites.
The bill specifically targets large multinational corporations, including companies like Exxon and Chevron, which are responsible for significant greenhouse gas emissions. Research indicates that just 32 companies have been linked to over half of the global fossil fuel and cement CO2 emissions as of 2024.
Supporters of the bill argue that it could generate billions of dollars to help Oregon communities prepare for and respond to the increasing frequency of climate-related disasters. In a recent public hearing, local leaders emphasized the urgency of the bill, citing the devastating impacts of previous events, such as the 2021 heat dome that claimed 69 lives in Multnomah County and the catastrophic 2020 Labor Day fires.
Darby Ayers-Flood, the mayor of Talent, Oregon, highlighted the lingering effects of the Labor Day fires on her community, where many families are still recovering from the loss of homes and businesses. She stated, "Now, more than ever, we need polluters to pick up their share of the burden. Small communities like mine cannot do it alone.".
Despite the support from local communities and environmental groups, the bill faces opposition from industry lobbyists who claim it could lead to higher costs for goods and services. For instance, the Oregon Trucking Association warned that increased costs associated with the bill would impact the delivery of essential goods.
Senator Jeff Golden, the chief sponsor of the bill, contended that the financial burden on consumers would be minimal. He argued that the bill seeks to recover penalties for past emissions rather than imposing new costs on current production.
The Climate Superfund bill has passed out of the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Wildfire and has been referred to the Joint Committee on Ways and Means for further consideration. However, its future remains uncertain as it may face delays or legal challenges similar to those encountered by similar bills in other states, including Vermont and New York.
New York's recent passage of a Climate Superfund law, which also requires fossil fuel companies to contribute to a fund for climate resilience projects, exemplifies the growing trend of holding polluters accountable. Governor Kathy Hochul emphasized that the law aims to protect New Yorkers from the escalating costs associated with climate change impacts.
As the effects of climate change become increasingly pronounced, lawmakers in Oregon and beyond are seeking innovative ways to finance climate adaptation and mitigation efforts. The bill's supporters believe that establishing a Climate Superfund could be a pivotal step toward achieving climate justice and resilience in the face of mounting challenges.
If the bill is enacted, it is anticipated that it will face legal scrutiny, mirroring the challenges faced by other states pursuing similar initiatives. The ongoing dialogue around the bill underscores the urgent need for comprehensive solutions to address the climate crisis and ensure that those responsible for emissions contribute to the recovery and resilience of affected communities.

Related articles

Trump's Mockery of Climate Change Amid Winter Storm Misguided

Former President Donald Trump has mocked climate change concerns, pointing to an impending winter storm as evidence against global warming. This perspective is fundamentally flawed, as climate scientists emphasize that short-term weather patterns cannot negate long-term climate trends.

Winter Storm Misconceptions: Climate Change Denied by Weather Claims

Recent claims by former President Trump linking a winter storm to the denial of global warming have been debunked by climate scientists. They emphasize that weather events do not negate long-term climate trends, explaining the distinction between short-term weather variations and the broader implications of climate change.

Trump Questions Climate Change as Winter Storm Approaches 40 States

As a major winter storm prepares to impact over 40 states, President Trump has publicly questioned the scientific consensus on climate change. His remarks have sparked responses from climate scientists who emphasize the distinction between short-term weather events and long-term climate trends.

Trump Faces Backlash Over Climate Claims as US Endures Cold Snap

As the US braces for a record cold wave and heavy snowfall, President Trump's comments questioning global warming have drawn sharp criticism on social media. Experts emphasize that extreme winter weather does not negate the reality of climate change, highlighting the ongoing global warming trend.

Trump Dismisses Climate Change Amid Severe Winter Storm Warnings

As a powerful winter storm approaches, President Trump has dismissed climate change concerns, claiming the cold weather contradicts global warming. Experts, however, emphasize that winter storms can still occur in a warming climate, which may even intensify such events.