A Los Angeles County jury awarded former LAPD commander Nicole Mehringer nearly $6 million, finding in her favor in a lawsuit against the department.The case revolved around her wrongful termination following an alcohol-related incident in 2018, where she argued that male colleagues were treated more leniently under similar circumstances.
Sources:
latimes.comaol.comMehringer's legal victory highlights ongoing concerns about gender discrimination within the LAPD.Her attorney, Greg Smith, emphasized that the jury agreed with her assertion that she was held to a different standard than her male counterparts, who allegedly faced little to no consequences.
Sources:
aol.comnationaltoday.com"I feel grateful and vindicated," Mehringer stated after the verdict, noting the decision was crucial in restoring her reputation.
Source:
aol.comThe case not only underscores individual injustices but also reflects broader issues within the department regarding equality and accountability.
Source:
nationaltoday.comThe incident that led to Mehringer's termination occurred on April 27, 2018, when she and her subordinate, Sgt.James Kelly, were found intoxicated in an unmarked police vehicle by Glendale police.While Kelly was charged with driving under the influence, Mehringer faced a single misdemeanor count of public intoxication, which was later dismissed after she completed a recovery program.
Sources:
latimes.comaol.comIn stark contrast, Kelly received only a demotion and reassignment within the department.Mehringer's lawsuit alleged that her conduct, while against department policy, was no more severe than that of male command staff who were allowed to retain their positions or even receive promotions following similar infractions.
Source:
nationaltoday.comDuring her trial, Mehringer's attorneys presented evidence of a double standard within the LAPD.This included testimony from former LAPD Chief Michel Moore, who was accused of lying about his involvement in the disciplinary actions against her.The jury found that Moore's testimony was pivotal, as it painted a picture of unequal treatment within the department.
Sources:
aol.comnationaltoday.comGreg Smith also highlighted the support Mehringer initially received from former LAPD deputy chief John Sherman, who later withdrew his endorsement after Mehringer sought to expose departmental misconduct.This withdrawal was seen as indicative of the challenges she faced within the organization.
Source:
latimes.comThe jury's decision on March 18, 2026, represents a significant legal set back for the LAPD, following other recent cases where female officers successfully sued the department for discrimination.For instance, in 2022, a jury awarded $4 million to another former commander, Lillian Carranza, over similar issues of gender discrimination.
Sources:
aol.comnationaltoday.comThis verdict not only serves as a personal victory for Mehringer but also emphasizes the need for systemic changes within the LAPD.The city's potential plans to appeal the jury's decision may further complicate the ongoing discussions about gender equity and accountability in law enforcement.
Source:
nationaltoday.comAs the LAPD faces scrutiny over its handling of gender discrimination cases, Mehringer's lawsuit may become a pivotal moment in the fight for equality within police ranks, potentially influencing policies and practices in the future.