Recent developments in the grant guidelines of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) signal a significant political shift under the Trump administration.The agency, which provides essential funding for libraries and museums across the United States, has introduced new criteria that encourage applicants to align their projects with President Trump's vision for America.
Source:
propublica.orgThe new guidelines, which accompany the agency's 2026 grant cycle, explicitly state a preference for projects that foster positive narratives about the country.This shift is heavily influenced by executive orders from Trump that target what he considers divisive ideologies, particularly those associated with discussions on race and history.
Source:
propublica.orgCritics argue that this approach represents a chilling departure from the agency's traditionally apolitical and merit-based grant processes.
Sources:
propublica.orgwordsandmoney.comIn previous years, the IMLS guidelines were focused on the quality and impact of proposed projects rather than their alignment with political ideologies.This change has raised concerns among former agency leaders and professionals in the museum and library sectors.Giovanna Urist, a former senior program officer at IMLS, described the new guidelines as "chilling," indicating that they could constrain how institutions present American history.
Source:
propublica.orgThe IMLS, established in 1996, is the primary federal source of support for libraries and museums, distributing funds crucial for community engagement and public access to information.
Source:
propublica.orgThe agency's funding serves to bolster institutions' capabilities, allowing them to care for collections and respond to disasters.However, the current political climate has prompted concerns about the potential scrutiny institutions may face when accepting grants under the new guidelines.
Source:
propublica.orgThere are fears that funding could be contingent upon an institution's adherence to the administration's political agenda, as seen in the recent audit of Smithsonian exhibits aimed at assessing their historical framing and alignment with perceived American ideals.
Sources:
propublica.orgwilmerhale.com"Accepting funds from IMLS could be interpreted as an endorsement of the executive orders," noted Sarah Weicksel, executive director of the American Historical Association.
Source:
propublica.orgThe implications of these guidelines extend beyond funding; they challenge the fundamental independence of cultural institutions.Traditionally, libraries and museums have been trusted community anchors, appreciated for their objectivity.
Source:
propublica.orgThe perceived politicization of federal funding threatens to undermine this trust, making institutions wary of the narratives they present.
Sources:
propublica.orgwordsandmoney.comThe political environment surrounding the IMLS has been turbulent.In 2026, the Trump administration attempted to eliminate the agency entirely through an executive order, but this effort was halted by legal challenges from state attorneys general and library associations.
Source:
propublica.orgDespite the reinstatement of grants after these legal battles, the ongoing political pressures continue to shape the agency's operations and funding decisions.
Source:
propublica.orgIn this context, the IMLS has also seen changes in leadership, with the appointment of Keith E.Sonderling, a deputy labor secretary with no prior experience in museums or libraries, as acting director.
Sources:
propublica.orgnonprofitlawblog.comThis decision has raised further questions about the agency's future direction and its commitment to serving a diverse range of cultural institutions.Amid these changes, grant applications are now being scrutinized more closely than before.The guidelines suggest that projects perceived as divisive or contrary to the administration's vision could face rejection.
Sources:
propublica.orgnonprofitlawblog.comUrist emphasized that the rules could lead to a homogenization of narratives, stifling diverse perspectives and critical discussions about America's complex history.
Source:
propublica.orgExperts in the field, including R.Crosby Kemper III, the agency's former director, have voiced strong opposition to the political direction of the IMLS.He criticized the administration's approach as an "extension of Trump’s animus towards anyone who disagrees with him," describing the new guidelines as "horrific.".
Sources:
propublica.orgwilmerhale.comAs institutions prepare to navigate this evolving landscape, many are left wondering about the long-term implications for their operations and the integrity of the cultural narratives they promote.The uncertainty surrounding federal funding may force libraries and museums to reconsider their programming and exhibition choices, potentially leading to a more controlled and less honest representation of American history.
Source:
propublica.orgIn conclusion, the political turn in grant guidelines for libraries and museums under the Trump administration raises significant concerns about the future of cultural institutions in the US The shift towards aligning funding with political narratives threatens to undermine the trust and independence that these institutions have historically maintained, leaving them to grapple with the implications of accepting federal support in an increasingly politicized environment.
