FedEx Seeks Refund for Trump Tariffs Following Supreme Court Ruling

Feb 24, 2026, 2:18 AM

Hover over text to view sources

FedEx has taken legal action against the US government, seeking a "full refund" of tariffs that were imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and ruled illegal by the Supreme Court last week. The lawsuit was filed in the US Court of International Trade and is notable as it is the first major refund claim following the high court's decision.

The Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump had exceeded his authority in imposing these tariffs, which affected nearly all US trading partners. In its complaint, FedEx stated that it paid IEEPA duties and suffered injury as a result of those tariffs. The lawsuit specifically names US Customs and Border Protection (CBP), its commissioner Rodney Scott, and the federal government as defendants.

While the exact amount FedEx seeks in refunds is not specified in the lawsuit, the company previously indicated that US trade policies, including these tariffs, could result in a $1 billion hit to its earnings for the fiscal year. The logistics firm, which processes approximately 17 million packages daily, is advocating for the return of all duties collected under the now-overturned tariff policies.

In the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling, FedEx emphasized the need to protect its rights as an importer and to seek refunds from CBP, although it noted that no refund process has yet been established by regulators or the courts. The company has stated it will provide updates as more information becomes available.

FedEx's lawsuit joins a growing list of legal actions initiated by various companies seeking refunds due to the tariffs. Other firms, including Costco, Revlon, and Bumble Bee Foods, have already filed similar lawsuits in the same court, and the issue of refunds is likely to spawn extensive litigation in lower courts, with trade experts predicting potential years of legal disputes.

In response to the Supreme Court's decision, 22 Democratic Senators have introduced legislation aimed at ensuring that the government issues refunds for the tariffs collected under IEEPA within 180 days, along with interest on those amounts. This proposal highlights ongoing efforts to address the financial impact of the tariffs on American businesses, especially small exporters who have faced significant challenges during the tariff period.

The Supreme Court's ruling, which struck down Trump's tariffs, has not only raised questions about the reimbursement process but has also led to new tariff proposals by the former president. Following the ruling, Trump announced a new 15% global tariff under a different trade law, signaling a continuation of trade tensions.

As FedEx and other companies navigate this complex legal landscape, the outcome of these lawsuits could have far-reaching implications for US trade policy and corporate finances in the coming years. The resolution of tariff refund issues remains uncertain, and businesses are closely watching for further developments from both the courts and the government.

With significant financial stakes involved, the dispute over tariff refunds is set to become a focal point of legal and economic discourse in the United States, as businesses seek to reclaim lost revenues and the government reexamines its trade policies.

Tariff Uncertainty Returns to Mid-Michigan Economy After Supreme Court Ruling

The recent US Supreme Court ruling on President Trump's tariffs has reignited uncertainty for small businesses in Mid-Michigan. As tariffs are re-evaluated, local entrepreneurs face challenges with pricing and supply chain stability, while state officials warn of broader economic impacts on families and industries.

Supreme Court Ruling Leaves Global Economy in Turmoil

The recent US Supreme Court ruling against President Trump's use of tariffs has introduced new uncertainties into the global economy. Analysts predict ongoing confusion regarding future tariff policies and potential renegotiations of trade agreements, while the immediate impacts are deemed minimal.

Who Are We Really Helping? WV Budget Bill Sparks Debate

The West Virginia House Finance panel and Senate have passed differing versions of the budget bill, igniting discussions about the allocation of funds and their impact on working families. Critics argue that insufficient focus on essential services like childcare undermines the bill's purpose of fostering economic stability.

Supreme Court Ruling on Trump's Tariffs Sparks Economic Debate

The Supreme Court's recent decision to strike down President Trump's tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act has raised critical questions about the future of US trade policy and its economic implications. This ruling is expected to affect businesses, consumers, and overall economic growth while leaving room for potential alternative tariff strategies.

Tariff Ruling Complicates Trump's Economic Strategy

A recent Supreme Court ruling has struck down several tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, creating uncertainty in US trade policy. As President Trump vows to implement new tariffs, analysts warn of potential economic repercussions, including inflation and market instability.