EPA Reverses Climate Change Finding, Impacting Emission Regulations

Feb 23, 2026, 2:32 AM

Hover over text to view sources

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced the repeal of the endangerment finding that has underpinned US climate policy for nearly two decades. This significant change allows for the reduction of regulations on greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles and industrial sources, marking a pivotal shift in the federal government's approach to climate change mitigation.

The endangerment finding, established in 2009, recognized that greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane pose a threat to public health and welfare by contributing to global warming. It provided the necessary legal foundation for the EPA to regulate emissions under the Clean Air Act, compelling the government to take action against climate change. President Donald Trump has characterized this finding as a burdensome regulation from the Obama administration, claiming it lacks factual and legal support.

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced that the repeal of the endangerment finding represents "the largest deregulatory action in American history." This action is part of a broader agenda aimed at rolling back regulations perceived as obstacles to economic growth and energy production. The administration argues that the repeal will lower costs for American families and revive the fossil fuel industry, particularly coal.

Critics of the repeal, including former President Barack Obama and various environmental organizations, have condemned the decision as a dangerous move that prioritizes corporate interests over public health and environmental protection. Obama stated that without the endangerment finding, Americans would be "less safe, less healthy, and less able to fight climate change." Environmental groups like the American Lung Association have announced plans to legally challenge the repeal, arguing it is unscientific and undermines decades of climate research.

The legal implications of this decision could be profound. The endangerment finding was a result of a Supreme Court ruling in 2007, which affirmed the EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gases. Legal experts suggest that the courts may require substantial justification for such a significant policy reversal, citing existing scientific evidence that supports the original finding. Michael Gerrard, a climate law expert, noted that the future of this repeal may hinge on the Supreme Court, which could potentially overturn established precedents.

The EPA's decision has also raised concerns about its broader ramifications. The endangerment finding not only affected vehicle emissions standards but also influenced regulations on power plants and stationary sources of pollution. The agency has indicated it will review and potentially rescind additional regulations that rely on the endangerment finding, further impacting climate policy across various sectors.

As the EPA moves forward with this deregulation agenda, the administration is also reconsidering other climate-related policies, which could exacerbate the already dire situation regarding climate change. Recent reports indicate that the last eleven years have been the hottest on record, underscoring the urgency of effective climate action.

In conclusion, the EPA's decision to repeal the endangerment finding marks a significant shift in the US approach to climate change. It raises critical questions about the future of environmental regulation and the potential impacts on public health and the global climate. As legal challenges loom and public outcry grows, the implications of this decision will be closely monitored by both proponents and opponents of climate action.

Supreme Court to Review Fossil Fuel Giants' Appeal in Climate Lawsuit

The Supreme Court has agreed to review an appeal from major fossil fuel companies like Suncor Energy and Exxon Mobil, who are seeking to dismiss a climate change lawsuit from Boulder, Colorado. The case could set a significant precedent for climate liability lawsuits across the country.

Trump Administration Revokes Key Climate Change Regulations

The Trump administration has repealed the endangerment finding, a crucial legal basis for regulating greenhouse gas emissions in the US This move is expected to lead to significant increases in emissions and has sparked widespread criticism and anticipated legal challenges from environmental groups and state leaders.

Supreme Court to Review Boulder County's Climate Case Against Oil Giants

The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a significant climate change lawsuit filed by Boulder County and the City of Boulder against ExxonMobil and Suncor. This case challenges the oil companies' accountability for their role in exacerbating climate change and seeks to ensure that they cover the costs incurred by local communities.

Texas Faces Rising Costs Amid Trump’s Climate Rollbacks

Texas is grappling with the repercussions of the Trump administration's recent rollbacks on climate regulations, which threaten to exacerbate extreme weather events and increase costs for residents. With billions at stake in health and infrastructure, the state can ill afford these changes as it navigates a future increasingly impacted by climate change.

Trump Administration Revokes Key Climate Change Finding

The Trump administration has revoked the 2009 endangerment finding, a pivotal scientific declaration that supported US climate regulations. This decision, described as a major deregulation effort, is expected to face significant legal challenges and could lead to an increase in greenhouse gas emissions.