EPA Rescinds Landmark Climate Ruling, Paving Way for Trump Deregulation

Feb 13, 2026, 2:19 AM
Image for article EPA Rescinds Landmark Climate Ruling, Paving Way for Trump Deregulation

Hover over text to view sources

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced the termination of the 2009 Endangerment Finding, a key ruling that recognized greenhouse gas emissions as a threat to public health and welfare. This decision clears the path for the Trump administration to roll back numerous environmental regulations implemented during previous administrations, particularly those aimed at combating climate change.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, in a press conference, stated that the finding had "no basis in law" and emphasized the need for regulatory relief for American families and businesses. The rescission is expected to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions regulations that have cost over $1 trillion since their inception, including federal mandates on electric vehicles and emissions standards for various industries.
The Endangerment Finding arose from a 2007 Supreme Court ruling that mandated the EPA assess whether greenhouse gas emissions endangered public health. The finding was officially announced by then-EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson in December 2009, following extensive scientific review. However, the Trump administration's recent actions have been positioned as a necessary correction to what they describe as overreach by the past administrations.
Critics of the decision argue that it undermines decades of scientific consensus on the dangers posed by climate change. They point out that evidence of climate change and its impacts has only strengthened since 2009, with recent studies confirming that greenhouse gases are increasingly harming public health. For instance, a 2025 review by the National Academies of Sciences stated that the evidence supporting the Endangerment Finding is now even more compelling than it was over a decade ago.
Legal challenges to the EPA's decision are anticipated, as environmental advocacy groups such as the Environmental Defense Fund and the Union of Concerned Scientists are preparing to file lawsuits. This legal scrutiny will likely focus on the processes the EPA undertook to justify the rescission and whether the agency adhered to the scientific standards required by the Clean Air Act.
In addition to the rollback of the Endangerment Finding, the Trump administration has signaled plans to reconsider other regulations that have emerged from it, further solidifying its commitment to deregulation in the energy sector. The administration argues that the previous regulations imposed significant costs on consumers and businesses, thus necessitating a return to what they deem "commonsense" policies that prioritize economic growth over regulatory constraints.
Supporters of the rollback celebrate the potential for reduced costs and increased consumer choice, particularly in the automotive sector. Zeldin emphasized that this move would end "sixteen years of uncertainty" for automakers and provide regulatory clarity. However, this perspective is met with skepticism from environmentalists who fear that such deregulation will exacerbate air pollution and climate change, ultimately endangering public health in the long run.
The broader implications of this policy shift extend beyond the automotive industry to various sectors reliant on fossil fuels, which may see a resurgence as regulatory pressures ease. Environmental groups warn that this could lead to a significant increase in greenhouse gas emissions, undermining US commitments to international climate agreements and efforts to mitigate climate change.
As the legal battles unfold and the administration pushes forward with its agenda, the future of US climate policy hangs in the balance. The administration's actions signal a stark departure from the increasingly urgent calls for climate action, even as scientific evidence mounts regarding the realities of climate change.
In conclusion, the rescinding of the Endangerment Finding marks a pivotal moment in US environmental policy, prioritizing deregulation and economic considerations over established scientific consensus on climate change. This decision is expected to face extensive legal challenges, reflecting the ongoing clash between environmental protections and regulatory reform under the Trump administration.

Related articles

Trump Administration Repeals EPA's Climate Regulations

The Trump administration has repealed key Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations, including the 2009 endangerment finding that recognized greenhouse gases as a threat to human health. This move effectively removes the legal basis for federal climate regulations, jeopardizing efforts to combat climate change and protect public health.

Czechs and Slovaks Recognize Climate Change, Question Political Will

A recent survey reveals that while most Czechs and Slovaks acknowledge climate change is real and largely driven by human activity, they express skepticism about the effectiveness of political responses. Disinformation campaigns continue to challenge the urgency of climate action in both countries.

Chris Bowen Affirms Clear Energy Policy under Albanese Government

Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen reiterated the Albanese government's commitment to a clear energy policy aimed at reducing emissions and promoting renewable energy. Following the Climate Change Authority's advice, the government set an ambitious emissions reduction target for 2035, fostering economic growth and job creation.

The Perverse Climate Policies of Donald Trump

Donald Trump's climate policies have sparked widespread criticism for their detrimental impact on environmental protections and clean energy initiatives. His administration's decisions have been labeled as both a betrayal of scientific consensus and an endorsement of fossil fuel dominance.

Doomsday Clock Warns: Trump's War on Renewable Energy Must End

The Doomsday Clock has been moved to just 85 seconds to midnight, signaling an urgent need to address global threats like climate change. Analysts warn that former President Trump's policies against renewable energy could exacerbate these issues, urging Congress to shift towards sustainable solutions.