EPA Chief Lauds Heartland Institute for Climate Change Opposition

Apr 12, 2026, 2:33 AM

Hover over text to view sources

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin recently delivered a keynote speech at the Heartland Institute's 16th International Conference on Climate Change in Washington, DC During his address, he commended the organization for its efforts in the 2000s to contest the scientific consensus on climate change and to oppose government interventions aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Zeldin emphasized that the gathering was a moment of celebration for those who challenge the prevailing narrative on climate change. "It's controversial that we won't sign up for the script that the world is imminently about to end," he stated, urging attendees to recognize their part in a broader ideological fight.

The Heartland Institute has a history of advocating against what it perceives as excessive environmental regulations, particularly those originating from the Obama and Biden administrations. Zeldin highlighted the EPA's recent actions in line with President Trump's deregulatory agenda, including the repeal of the "endangerment finding," a crucial policy that previously enabled the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles.

Critics quickly responded to Zeldin's remarks. Joanna Slaney, vice president of political and government affairs at the Environmental Defense Fund, condemned both Zeldin and the Heartland Institute for their stance on climate change. She warned that denying the realities of climate-related challenges only exacerbates the situation, as evidenced by rising energy costs and public health risks stemming from extreme weather events.

The backlash continued outside the conference venue, where EDF Action displayed posters depicting the impacts of climate change, including images of smokestacks and forest fires. This protest underscored the significant division between environmental advocates and the Trump administration's agenda as articulated by Zeldin.

Zeldin's comments also reflect a broader trend among certain political leaders who argue that deregulation can boost economic growth. Myron Ebell, a prominent figure at the Heartland Institute, echoed this sentiment, praising Zeldin for his energetic promotion of the Trump administration's policies.

Supporters of Zeldin's approach argue that the repeal of the endangerment finding will lead to substantial economic benefits, potentially saving Americans billions in compliance costs. They contend that such actions restore consumer choice and foster a more favorable environment for businesses, especially small enterprises that have felt burdened by regulatory mandates.

In contrast, environmental experts caution that the rollback of climate regulations poses risks not only to ecosystems but also to public health. With climate change effects becoming increasingly evident, the debate surrounding the effectiveness of deregulation versus regulation continues to be a contentious issue in US politics.

As Zeldin's tenure unfolds, the environmental community will be closely monitoring the impacts of the EPA's policies on both the climate and public health, as well as the ongoing legal battles over climate regulations and state versus federal authority in addressing these issues.

This clash between regulatory and deregulatory philosophies highlights a pivotal moment in US environmental policy and raises essential questions about the future of climate action in the face of political opposition.

In summary, Zeldin's remarks at the Heartland Institute exemplify the ongoing tension in American politics regarding climate change and environmental regulation, with implications that extend far beyond mere policy debates.

SNP's Climate Change Plan Criticized as Delusional and Ineffectual

The Scottish National Party's newly unveiled climate change plan for 2026-2040 faces widespread criticism for its perceived lack of practicality and credibility. Critics argue that the plan is driven by ideology rather than sound energy policy, with significant concerns about its economic impact and feasibility.

Australia Urged to Combat Climate Change Misinformation, Senate Report Finds

A Senate report has called for urgent action against the spread of misinformation surrounding climate change in Australia. The inquiry highlighted the significant role of major media outlets, particularly News Corp, in perpetuating climate denial narratives, which undermine public understanding and hinder effective climate action.

Northern Ireland's New Climate Adaptation Strategy Unveiled

The Northern Ireland Executive has approved the third iteration of its Climate Change Adaptation Programme, aiming to enhance resilience against climate change from 2024 to 2029. With 280 proposed actions across various sectors, the initiative seeks to address the pressing impacts of climate change experienced by local communities and industries.

Northern Ireland's New Climate Change Plan to Enhance Resilience

The Northern Ireland Executive has approved a new Climate Change Adaptation Programme (NICCAP3) featuring 280 actions aimed at enhancing resilience to climate change from 2024 to 2029. This collaborative effort involves multiple stakeholders and addresses pressing environmental challenges faced by various sectors.

Unfinished Business in the Pacific: Nuclear Legacy and Climate Crisis

The Pacific Islands continue to grapple with the lasting impacts of nuclear testing and the escalating climate crisis. Survivors of nuclear testing demand justice and recognition from nuclear powers, while the region faces urgent challenges related to climate change and displacement. Collaboration among Pacific nations is crucial for addressing these intertwined issues.