DOJ Un-redacts Names in Epstein Files Amid Lawmaker Pressure

Feb 11, 2026, 2:25 AM
Image for article DOJ Un-redacts Names in Epstein Files Amid Lawmaker Pressure

Hover over text to view sources

The Justice Department (DOJ) has recently un-redacted several names in the Jeffrey Epstein files after facing significant pressure from lawmakers. This action comes as part of the ongoing scrutiny regarding the handling of documents related to Epstein, a convicted sex offender, and his network of associates, which includes many influential figures.
Among the names revealed were billionaire Les Wexner, Epstein's longtime assistant Lesley Groff, and former French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel, identified as co-conspirators in a 2019 FBI document. Wexner, the former CEO of Victoria's Secret parent company L Brands, had previously distanced himself from Epstein, claiming he severed ties in 2007. However, the recent un-redactions have prompted fresh scrutiny of Wexner's past association with Epstein, especially given that he had previously been mentioned multiple times in the unredacted documents.
The pressure for un-redaction came from lawmakers like Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who expressed frustration over the DOJ's previous redactions. During an interview, Massie noted that the DOJ had concealed the identities of several individuals who could potentially be implicated due to their connections with Epstein. He stated that at least six names were redacted that might indicate involvement in Epstein's criminal activities.
California Rep. Ro Khanna, another key figure in pushing for transparency, echoed Massie's concerns, emphasizing that the release of Epstein files should not come at the expense of survivors’ privacy. Khanna criticized the DOJ for what he termed a "cover-up," suggesting that the agency's actions were obstructing a full understanding of the extent of Epstein's operations and those who may have aided him.
The DOJ has maintained that its redactions were necessary to protect the privacy of victims and ongoing investigations. However, critics argue that these justifications are insufficient, especially given the law mandating the release of these documents, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, passed by Congress. In a statement, Khanna mentioned that the partial release of documents raises serious concerns about compliance with the law and the DOJ's commitment to transparency.
The latest un-redacted documents also revealed an email from Epstein to a recipient that was initially redacted, which Massie identified as Sultan Bin Sulayem, an Emirati businessman. This email referenced a "torture video," although the context remains unclear.
Furthermore, the DOJ's handling of the Epstein case has drawn scrutiny beyond just the recent document release. Lawmakers have raised questions about the previous non-prosecution agreement Epstein reached in 2007, which allowed him to serve only 13 months in jail for charges related to prostitution. Critics, including those in Congress, have called for a reevaluation of how the DOJ has approached Epstein's case and the broader implications for justice regarding high-profile individuals involved.
As the investigation continues, survivors and advocates have stressed the need for complete transparency and accountability. They argue that the ongoing redactions and selective disclosures only serve to protect powerful figures while further victimizing those who suffered at Epstein's hands. The public and lawmakers alike await further un-redacted documents to shed light on the extensive network surrounding Epstein and the potential complicity of his associates.
The DOJ's recent actions, alongside the ongoing scrutiny from Congress, suggest that the fight for transparency in the Epstein case is far from over. As lawmakers continue to push for the release of additional information, the implications of these revelations could have lasting effects on public trust in the justice system.

Related articles

Immigration Officials Defend Enforcement Actions Amid Congressional Scrutiny

During a recent Congressional hearing, officials from the Department of Homeland Security defended President Trump's immigration enforcement policies, highlighting the hiring of new ICE officers and the deployment of body-worn cameras for agents. The session was marked by heated exchanges, particularly regarding the administration's approach to immigration in Democrat-led areas.

Pritzker Endorses Margaret Croke for Illinois Comptroller

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker is endorsing State Representative Margaret Croke for the position of state comptroller. Croke, a close ally of Pritzker, aims to leverage this support to secure her candidacy ahead of the March primary.

Trump's Attacks on Journalists: A Tired Political Strategy

Former President Donald Trump's ongoing verbal assaults on journalists exemplify a political strategy that aims to distract and manipulate public perception. These confrontations reveal his disdain for critical questioning, particularly towards women reporters, and serve to reinforce his narrative among supporters while undermining media credibility.

Alex Vindman on ICE and Trump's Leadership in Senate Bid

Alex Vindman, a prominent Democrat and former National Security Council official, has launched his campaign for the US Senate in Florida. He criticizes Donald Trump's leadership style, describing it as chaotic and corrupt, and emphasizes the need for reform in immigration enforcement.

NSA's Detection of Foreign Call Raises Questions in Trump Circle

The NSA detected a phone call involving a person close to Donald Trump and a foreign intelligence associate, sparking controversy over the handling of classified information. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is accused of obstructing the report's distribution, leading to a whistleblower complaint and political fallout.