Congress Demands Vote on War Powers After Trump's Iran Strike

Mar 1, 2026, 2:31 AM
Image for article Congress Demands Vote on War Powers After Trump's Iran Strike

Hover over text to view sources

Key members of Congress are calling for a swift vote on a war powers resolution aimed at restraining President Donald Trump's military actions against Iran. This push arises from concerns that the administration's campaign could be illegal and may risk further entangling the United States in Middle Eastern conflicts.
Both the House and Senate, where Trump's Republican Party holds a slim majority, had drafted war powers resolutions before the strikes occurred. The upcoming debate is expected to serve as a referendum on Trump's decision to pursue military action without formal authorization from Congress.
Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat from Virginia and a leader in the bipartisan effort, criticized the president's actions, questioning whether Trump has learned from the consequences of US involvement in Iran and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East. He labeled the strikes as "a colossal mistake.".
In the House, Representatives Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) are insisting that Congress must publicly vote on their bipartisan measure. "Congress must convene on Monday to vote," Khanna stated, emphasizing the need for legislative oversight.
Contrasting with the Democrats' concerns, many Republican leaders have supported Trump's actions against Iran. They argue that the threat posed by Iran's nuclear program and missile capabilities necessitates a military response. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) praised the president's determination, stating, "Well done, Mr President.".
The administration's decision to engage in military operations, reportedly in coordination with Israel, raises significant constitutional questions regarding the separation of powers. While the Constitution grants the president authority as commander in chief for certain military operations, Congress holds the power to declare war. Historical precedent shows that previous administrations, including that of George W. Bush, sought congressional authorization before initiating major military actions.
Despite the urgency of the situation, the congressional debate on war powers may ultimately be symbolic. Even if a resolution passes through the narrowly divided Congress, it is likely that Trump would veto it. Congress does not possess the two-thirds majority necessary to override such a veto, thus limiting the effectiveness of the vote.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) expressed the party's longstanding views, asserting that Iran faces "the severe consequences of its evil actions." He noted that leadership was briefed earlier in the week about the necessity of military action to safeguard US interests.
Many Democrats are labeling the military operation illegal, arguing that the administration has not provided sufficient justification for the strikes. Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, described the president's actions as an "illegal, regime-change war against Iran." He called for an immediate Senate vote on the War Powers Resolution to halt these operations.
House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries emphasized the need for authorization for any preemptive military force, stating, "While Iran is a 'bad actor,' the administration must seek authorization for actions that constitute an act of war.".
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has called for immediate briefings on the administration's military strategy, expressing concern that the American public does not want another prolonged conflict in the Middle East.
As Congress prepares for this rare war powers debate, the implications of Trump's unilateral military actions will be closely scrutinized, potentially reshaping the dynamics of executive and legislative power in matters of war.
Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Matt Brown contributed to this report.
By LISA MASCARO, AP Congressional Correspondent.

Related articles

Trump Urged to Declare Emergency for Election Control

Pro-Trump activists are pushing for a draft executive order that would enable President Trump to declare a national emergency regarding election integrity, citing alleged foreign interference. Critics argue this move undermines constitutional authority over elections, which rests with state legislatures and Congress.

James Talarico Aims for a Texas Senate Surprise in November

Texas state Rep. James Talarico is gearing up for a competitive Senate primary against Rep. Jasmine Crockett, with hopes of surprising voters in November. Talarico's campaign emphasizes coalition-building and a message of civility, while he seeks to energize the Democratic base in a traditionally Republican state.

Biden Accuses Trump of Attempting to 'Steal' Midterm Elections

In a recent speech, Joe Biden warned that Donald Trump will try to 'steal' the upcoming midterm elections by imposing restrictive voting requirements. Biden emphasized the importance of voter turnout as a means to counteract Trump's efforts and criticized his administration's actions as detrimental to democracy.

Congress to Vote on Trump's War Powers Following Iran Strikes

In the wake of President Trump's military strikes on Iran, Congress is preparing to vote on war powers resolutions aimed at limiting his authority for further military action. Lawmakers are divided, with many Democrats and a handful of Republicans criticizing the strikes as illegal and demanding a formal vote.

Delaware Lawmakers Condemn Trump's Iran Strikes as Reckless

Delaware's congressional delegation has sharply criticized President Trump's recent military strikes on Iran, labeling them as reckless and unconstitutional. The lawmakers expressed concerns that these actions could escalate into a broader conflict without Congressional approval.