Clean Energy Advocates Win Majority in Salt River Project Election

Apr 10, 2026, 2:46 AM
Image for article Clean Energy Advocates Win Majority in Salt River Project Election

Hover over text to view sources

In a pivotal election for the Salt River Project (SRP) in Arizona, clean energy candidates have achieved a significant victory, securing a majority on the board. This outcome comes at a time of rising household electricity prices and growing concerns about the environmental impact of traditional energy sources, particularly fossil fuels.
The SRP election, which took place on April 7, drew unprecedented attention, largely due to involvement from Turning Point USA, a conservative political organization. This group mobilized resources to support candidates aligned with business interests and traditional energy sectors, aiming to counter the influence of clean energy advocates. Despite this, the clean energy slate managed to flip several key seats, ending with an 8-6 majority on the board.
Historically, the SRP elections have been characterized by low voter turnout and a unique voting system that favors larger landowners. Votes are weighted by acreage, meaning that individuals with larger properties have more influence over the election outcomes, while renters and smaller landowners often have minimal voting power. This year, however, voter participation surged, with over 36,000 ballots cast, a dramatic increase from the previous average of around 7,500 votes in past elections.
The clean energy candidates, part of a coalition advocating for renewable energy sources, emphasized the need for SRP to transition away from fossil fuels. They argue that the utility can meet the growing demand for electricity, projected to increase by roughly 4% annually, through investments in solar power, battery storage, and energy efficiency initiatives. Their plans include expanding solar energy capacity and promoting home energy efficiency programs to reduce demand during peak usage periods.
The election results indicate a shift in the board's direction, with clean energy advocates like Sandra Kennedy and Casey Clowes continuing to push for policies that favor renewable resources. Although Turning Point-backed candidates secured the presidency and vice presidency, clean energy proponents believe that having a board majority allows them to steer SRP management towards more sustainable practices.
Critics of Turning Point's involvement in the election assert that their strategies may have backfired. Many candidates endorsed by the organization had previously held positions on the board, and their support did not translate into a majority victory. Some local political figures have described the election results as a setback for Turning Point, suggesting that their aggressive campaigning may have alienated potential voters concerned about local issues being overshadowed by national politics.
The clean energy coalition's victory is seen as a response to the increasing demand for accountability and lower energy costs from SRP. Vianey Olivarría, a representative from Chispa Arizona PAC, noted that the election reflects a growing public sentiment demanding a shift towards more environmentally-friendly energy policies and practices. The clean energy slate's success could lead to substantial changes in how SRP approaches energy generation in the coming years.
As SRP navigates this transition, the implications extend beyond the utility itself. The election results may influence broader energy policy discussions in Arizona and potentially inspire similar movements in other states where utility elections are becoming battlegrounds for environmental and energy policy debates. The involvement of national organizations and the mobilization of local voters indicate that utility governance is increasingly a matter of public interest and political significance.
Overall, the clean energy team's election win represents a crucial step towards transforming SRP's energy landscape, positioning the utility to embrace renewable sources amid ongoing challenges related to climate change and energy affordability. With a majority on the board, advocates are optimistic about implementing policies that could lead to a more sustainable energy future for the Phoenix metropolitan area and beyond.

Related articles

Trump Administration Proposes Weakening Coal Ash Disposal Rules

The Trump administration has proposed significant rollbacks to rules governing the disposal of coal ash, a waste product that can contaminate groundwater with hazardous heavy metals. The move has sparked concerns among environmental advocates about potential pollution and public health risks.

Trump's EPA Chief Celebrates Climate Denial at Heartland Conference

Lee Zeldin, the EPA Administrator, delivered the keynote address at a conference organized by the Heartland Institute, a group known for its climate change skepticism. In his speech, Zeldin celebrated the repeal of the 'endangerment finding,' which previously supported federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, while dismissing established climate science.

MD Lawmakers Finalize Energy Legislation Amid Rising Costs

Maryland lawmakers have reached an agreement on the Utility RELIEF Act, a comprehensive energy legislation aimed at lowering costs and enhancing the grid. While the bill is expected to provide significant savings for consumers, final details are still being negotiated before it can be presented to Governor Wes Moore.

Maryland Leaders Finalize Comprehensive Utility RELIEF Act

Maryland House Speaker Joseline Peña-Melnyk and Senate President Bill Ferguson announced an agreement on the Utility RELIEF Act, aimed at reducing energy bills and enhancing utility oversight. The legislation promises average savings of $150 annually for residents while promoting clean energy initiatives.

Maryland Senate Passes Energy Bill, Setting Up Clash with House

The Maryland Senate has approved the Utility RELIEF Act, aimed at reducing electric bills for residents. This legislation is poised to create a significant conflict with the House of Delegates, which has proposed more aggressive measures to lower utility costs.