Amazon's Tax Bill Drops Dramatically Post-GOP Tax Cuts

Feb 7, 2026, 2:46 AM
Image for article Amazon's Tax Bill Drops Dramatically Post-GOP Tax Cuts

Hover over text to view sources

Amazon's tax bill has seen a significant reduction, falling to $1.2 billion last year from $9 billion the previous year, despite a staggering 45% increase in its profits, which reached nearly $90 billion. This drop in tax liability can be attributed primarily to the extensive depreciation breaks included in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) enacted by the GOP in 2017.
The TCJA, which lowered the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, was intended to incentivize investment in the US economy. However, critics argue that it has disproportionately benefited large corporations like Amazon, allowing them to significantly reduce their tax bills. Amazon has stated that it invested around $340 billion in the US last year, emphasizing its role as a leader in innovation and economic growth.
The company's effective federal tax rate for 2025 was reported to be 19.6%, although this figure does not fully reflect the impact of the substantial depreciation write-offs that the TCJA allows, which essentially shifts tax liabilities to future periods. Amazon asserted that while the policy enables quicker deductions, it does not alter the total amount of tax owed over time.
In terms of cash payments made to the Treasury Department, Amazon reported contributing $2.75 billion in income taxes last year, down from $7.63 billion in 2024. Notably, Amazon has never paid the corporate alternative minimum tax, a provision aimed at ensuring that profitable companies pay at least a minimum amount in taxes.
The reduction in Amazon's tax bill has sparked renewed criticism, particularly from Democratic lawmakers who have long accused the company of not paying its fair share. Amazon faces scrutiny not just for its tax payments, but also for how it allocates its resources post-tax cuts. Critics highlight that much of the financial relief provided by the TCJA has not translated into significant benefits for workers, who have seen minimal wage increases or bonuses related to the tax cuts.
While the tax cuts were marketed as a means to stimulate wage growth and domestic investment, the reality appears to show that most benefits have flowed to shareholders instead. Corporations have largely utilized their tax savings to buy back shares rather than invest in workforce expansion or employee compensation.
The overall impact of the TCJA has been a significant drop in corporate tax revenues, which fell by about one-third in the years following its enactment, while corporate profits have soared. In fact, Amazon has reported paying no federal income taxes on billions in profits over the past two years, even receiving tax rebates, which raises questions about the effectiveness of the tax law in promoting equitable fiscal responsibility among large corporations.
As lawmakers continue to debate the future of tax policy, the implications of the TCJA and its effects on companies like Amazon remain central to discussions on fiscal fairness and economic equity. The ongoing scrutiny of Amazon's tax strategy serves as a reminder of the complex interplay between corporate profits, tax legislation, and the responsibilities of large corporations to contribute to the public good.
Moving forward, how Amazon and similar corporations respond to public and governmental pressure regarding tax contributions may shape the narrative around corporate accountability in America.
The case of Amazon exemplifies broader concerns regarding the tax landscape post-GOP cuts and underscores the need for ongoing examination of corporate tax strategies in relation to economic performance and societal expectations.

Related articles

Trump's $65 Billion Tax Refund Plan: A Boon for Higher Incomes

Bank of America predicts a $65 billion economic boost from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, primarily benefiting higher-income households. This fiscal injection may exacerbate the existing wealth disparity in the US, as wealthier individuals are expected to save rather than spend their refunds.

Fed's Jefferson Optimistic About Economy Amid Job Market Stabilization

Federal Reserve Vice Chair Philip Jefferson expressed cautious optimism regarding the 2026 economic outlook, noting stabilization in the job market and a decline in inflation towards the Fed's target. Jefferson emphasized that current monetary policy is well-positioned to adapt to evolving economic conditions.

Supreme Court Ruling Could End Customs Bond Market Boom Fueled by Trump's Tariffs

The Supreme Court is set to rule on the legality of President Trump's tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which could have significant financial implications. Billions in customs bonds, essential to US importers, are at stake, as these bonds have surged alongside increased tariffs, creating a booming market but raising costs for businesses.

Fed Chair Powell's Mixed Signals on Economy Impact Trump

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell announced that interest rates are likely to remain unchanged amid ongoing economic uncertainties tied to President Trump's policies. While Powell acknowledged a healthy economy, he warned that rising tariffs and other factors could complicate growth, creating challenges for Trump.

Wall Street Reacts to Trump's Fed Pick, Kevin Warsh: Senate Hurdles Ahead

President Trump has nominated Kevin Warsh as the next chair of the Federal Reserve, sparking varied reactions on Wall Street. While markets are cautiously optimistic, Warsh faces significant hurdles in the Senate, particularly from Republican opposition.