Trump's EPA Claims Climate Change Poses No Health Risks

Feb 19, 2026, 2:22 AM

Hover over text to view sources

The Trump administration has taken a significant step in its campaign against climate regulations by announcing plans to rescind the 2009 endangerment finding. This finding, established under the Obama administration, recognized that six greenhouse gases contribute to climate change and endanger public health and welfare.

The EPA's new stance, articulated by Administrator Lee Zeldin, claims that climate change does not pose a risk to public health. This assertion has been met with skepticism and criticism from health professionals, who argue that the administration's arguments are factually incorrect and potentially harmful.

Growing Health Risks Linked to Climate Change

Numerous studies have documented the adverse health effects associated with climate change, highlighting a variety of risks that affect vulnerable populations. Extreme heat, for example, has become increasingly common and is linked to a rise in heat-related illnesses and deaths. From the 1990s to the 2010s, global heat-related deaths increased by 23%, with the US experiencing particularly devastating heat events like the 2021 Pacific Northwest heat dome that resulted in hundreds of fatalities.

Air quality is another significant concern. As climate change exacerbates wildfires and other environmental factors, air pollution levels have risen, contributing to respiratory ailments and cardiovascular diseases. Wildfire smoke, which contains harmful particulate matter, can cause lung damage and increase the risk of heart attacks.

Infectious diseases also pose a growing threat as warming temperatures expand the habitats for disease-carrying insects. Instances of mosquito-borne illnesses such as dengue fever have been reported in states like Florida and Texas, raising alarms among public health officials.

Administration's Deregulatory Actions

The decision to rescind the endangerment finding is part of a broader deregulatory agenda aimed at rolling back policies deemed burdensome to businesses. Proponents of this move, including members of Congress and administration officials, argue that it will reduce costs for consumers and promote energy independence.

However, critics warn that disregarding the health impacts of climate change could lead to increased healthcare costs and loss of life. They emphasize that the evidence linking climate change to public health threats has grown significantly, with thousands of peer-reviewed studies supporting the claim that climate change is detrimental to health.

Implications for Future Policy

As the Trump administration shifts its climate policy, the implications for public health and environmental governance are substantial. Experts argue that recognizing the health impacts of climate change is crucial for developing effective public health strategies.

The rollback of the endangerment finding not only undermines existing regulations but also sets a precedent for future policy decisions that could prioritize economic interests over public health. As climate change continues to pose significant challenges, the need for comprehensive strategies that address both environmental and health concerns remains critical.

In conclusion, while the Trump administration asserts that climate change does not endanger public health, the overwhelming scientific evidence points to a different reality. The decision to rescind the endangerment finding raises serious concerns about the future of public health and environmental policy in the United States.

Trump's EPA Dismisses Climate Change Risks to Public Health

The Trump administration has proposed to rescind the 2009 EPA endangerment finding, claiming climate change does not pose a public health risk. Experts counter that extensive research links climate change to severe health outcomes, highlighting the dangers of extreme weather, air pollution, and infectious diseases.

Trump's EPA Says Climate Change Does Not Endanger Public Health

The Trump administration's EPA has moved to rescind the 2009 endangerment finding, asserting that greenhouse gases do not threaten public health. This controversial decision could reshape US climate policy and has sparked significant backlash from health experts and environmental advocates.

Affordability and Climate Change: An Interconnected Crisis

The rising costs of living are increasingly tied to climate change, affecting food prices, housing, and healthcare. As extreme weather events become more frequent, the financial burden on households grows, particularly for low-income communities. Addressing climate change is essential for improving affordability and ensuring a sustainable future.

Parents Struggle to Model Low-Carbon Lifestyles Despite Climate Concerns

A University of Bath study reveals parents often struggle to adopt low-carbon lifestyles despite climate concerns, citing time pressures and structural barriers. Researchers highlight the need for policy support to help parents model sustainable behaviors, while a personal account shows some parents naturally live low-carbon lives without external pressure.

Scientists Criticize Trump Climate Reports and Public Health Risks

Scientists condemned Trump administration reports for downplaying climate change risks, while FEMA cuts and anti-science policies sparked concerns over public health. Environmentalists mobilize against potential deregulation amid renewed threats to clean energy programs.